Qualitative MRI features in the differentiation between primary and secondary CNS lymphoma.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yusuf Kenan Cetinoglu, Kazım Ayberk Sinci, Merve Horoz, Fazıl Gelal
{"title":"Qualitative MRI features in the differentiation between primary and secondary CNS lymphoma.","authors":"Yusuf Kenan Cetinoglu, Kazım Ayberk Sinci, Merve Horoz, Fazıl Gelal","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03594-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Differentiating between primary CNS lymphomas (PCNSL) and secondary CNS lymphomas (SCNSL) remains a challenge in imaging. The aim of this study was to differentiate histopathologically-proven PCNSL and SCNSL by using 25 qualitative VASARI and five other MRI features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRIs of 31 cases (19 PCNSL and 12 SCNSL) obtained between January 2010 and February 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Two blinded readers independently evaluated images without knowledge of clinical data or whether CNS lymphoma was primary or secondary. The findings of each reader were recorded to assess interreader agreement. The results of two readers were evaluated by a senior neuroradiologist to reach a consensus. A statistical analysis was performed on the collected data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most VASARI features showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups, except for two features. Tumor location exhibited a statistically different distribution between PCNSL and SCNSL groups (p = 0.036). Proportion of edema was greater in the PCNSL group compared to the SCNSL group (p = 0.049). Among other MRI features, infratentorial involvement was more frequent in the SCNSL group (p = 0.014), while notch sign was more commonly detected in the PCNSL group (p = 0.027). Inter-reader agreement for VASARI features ranged from moderate to almost perfect, and for other MRI features, it ranged from fair to almost perfect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the challenges in distinguishing imaging features of PCNSL and SCNSL; frontal lobe location, a higher proportion of edema and the presence of a notch sign may indicate PCNSL, while infratentorial involvement may suggest SCNSL.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03594-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Differentiating between primary CNS lymphomas (PCNSL) and secondary CNS lymphomas (SCNSL) remains a challenge in imaging. The aim of this study was to differentiate histopathologically-proven PCNSL and SCNSL by using 25 qualitative VASARI and five other MRI features.

Methods: MRIs of 31 cases (19 PCNSL and 12 SCNSL) obtained between January 2010 and February 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Two blinded readers independently evaluated images without knowledge of clinical data or whether CNS lymphoma was primary or secondary. The findings of each reader were recorded to assess interreader agreement. The results of two readers were evaluated by a senior neuroradiologist to reach a consensus. A statistical analysis was performed on the collected data.

Results: Most VASARI features showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups, except for two features. Tumor location exhibited a statistically different distribution between PCNSL and SCNSL groups (p = 0.036). Proportion of edema was greater in the PCNSL group compared to the SCNSL group (p = 0.049). Among other MRI features, infratentorial involvement was more frequent in the SCNSL group (p = 0.014), while notch sign was more commonly detected in the PCNSL group (p = 0.027). Inter-reader agreement for VASARI features ranged from moderate to almost perfect, and for other MRI features, it ranged from fair to almost perfect.

Conclusion: Despite the challenges in distinguishing imaging features of PCNSL and SCNSL; frontal lobe location, a higher proportion of edema and the presence of a notch sign may indicate PCNSL, while infratentorial involvement may suggest SCNSL.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信