Effectiveness of ChatGPT for educators professional development: An empirical study with medical faculty.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS

Nutrition and health Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1177/02601060251315795

Wael Sh Basri, Razaz Waheeb Attar, Salem Albagmi, Daneah Alibrahim, Fahad Alanezi, Saud Asman Almutairi, Hoda M AboAlsamh, Ibrahim Tawfeeq Alsedrah, Wejdan M Arif, Abeer Abdullah Alsadhan, Duha Sami AlSanad, Wala Sultan Alsultan, Hafsa Alabdullateef, Miznah Hizam AlShammary, Amal Mubarak Bakhshwain, Afnan Fahd Almuhanna, Munerah Almulhem, Norah Alnaim, Amal Hassan Alhazmi

{"title":"Effectiveness of ChatGPT for educators professional development: An empirical study with medical faculty.","authors":"Wael Sh Basri, Razaz Waheeb Attar, Salem Albagmi, Daneah Alibrahim, Fahad Alanezi, Saud Asman Almutairi, Hoda M AboAlsamh, Ibrahim Tawfeeq Alsedrah, Wejdan M Arif, Abeer Abdullah Alsadhan, Duha Sami AlSanad, Wala Sultan Alsultan, Hafsa Alabdullateef, Miznah Hizam AlShammary, Amal Mubarak Bakhshwain, Afnan Fahd Almuhanna, Munerah Almulhem, Norah Alnaim, Amal Hassan Alhazmi","doi":"10.1177/02601060251315795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study purposethis study aims to investigate the extent to which ChatGPT enhances medical educators' pedagogical practices, fosters reflective teaching, and contributes to their ongoing learning and growth.Methodsthis cross-sectional survey study assessed ChatGPT's efficacy in contributing to professional development among medical educators. Utilizing purposive and convenience sampling, a questionnaire was administered to 309 medical educators. Statistical analyses, including t-tests and ANOVA, were conducted to evaluate perceptions of ChatGPT's effectiveness, considering demographic factors and impairment types.Resultsresource recommendations received the highest mean score (4.08), while continuing education had the lowest (3.62). T-tests showed no significant gender differences (p > .05), while ANOVA indicated significant variances across job roles (p < .0001) and age groups (p < .0001). Lecturers consistently rated ChatGPT's support highest, followed by assistant professors and associate professors, with professors providing lower ratings.ConclusionChatGPT's efficacy in providing personalized feedback, resource recommendations, pedagogical guidance, and other forms of support. However, addressing challenges such as ethical considerations and ensuring accuracy remains imperative for its effective integration into educational contexts.","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"2601060251315795"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060251315795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study purposethis study aims to investigate the extent to which ChatGPT enhances medical educators' pedagogical practices, fosters reflective teaching, and contributes to their ongoing learning and growth.Methodsthis cross-sectional survey study assessed ChatGPT's efficacy in contributing to professional development among medical educators. Utilizing purposive and convenience sampling, a questionnaire was administered to 309 medical educators. Statistical analyses, including t-tests and ANOVA, were conducted to evaluate perceptions of ChatGPT's effectiveness, considering demographic factors and impairment types.Resultsresource recommendations received the highest mean score (4.08), while continuing education had the lowest (3.62). T-tests showed no significant gender differences (p > .05), while ANOVA indicated significant variances across job roles (p < .0001) and age groups (p < .0001). Lecturers consistently rated ChatGPT's support highest, followed by assistant professors and associate professors, with professors providing lower ratings.ConclusionChatGPT's efficacy in providing personalized feedback, resource recommendations, pedagogical guidance, and other forms of support. However, addressing challenges such as ethical considerations and ensuring accuracy remains imperative for its effective integration into educational contexts.

查看原文本刊更多论文

ChatGPT对教育工作者专业发展的有效性：以医学院为对象的实证研究。

研究目的本研究旨在探讨ChatGPT在多大程度上提高了医学教育者的教学实践，促进了反思性教学，并有助于他们的持续学习和成长。方法本横断面调查研究评估了ChatGPT在促进医学教育工作者专业发展方面的功效。采用目的明确、方便抽样的方法，对309名医学教育工作者进行问卷调查。统计分析，包括t检验和方差分析，在考虑人口因素和损伤类型的情况下，对ChatGPT的有效性进行评估。结果资源推荐的平均得分最高（4.08分），继续教育的平均得分最低（3.62分）。t检验显示性别差异不显著（p < 0.05），而方差分析显示工作角色之间存在显著差异（p < 0.05）

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

160