Differential efficacy of first licensed western vaccines protecting without immunopathogenesis Wuhan-1-challenged hamsters from severe COVID-19.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Aileen Ebenig, Mona V Lange, Michelle Gellhorn Serra, Alexandra Kupke, Roland Plesker, Bingqian Qu, Richard J P Brown, Thorsten J Maier, Michael D Mühlebach
{"title":"Differential efficacy of first licensed western vaccines protecting without immunopathogenesis Wuhan-1-challenged hamsters from severe COVID-19.","authors":"Aileen Ebenig, Mona V Lange, Michelle Gellhorn Serra, Alexandra Kupke, Roland Plesker, Bingqian Qu, Richard J P Brown, Thorsten J Maier, Michael D Mühlebach","doi":"10.1038/s41541-025-01100-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Four COVID-19 vaccines were developed, tested, and authorized early in Europe and the US. Comirnaty and Spikevax are mRNA-based, whereas Jcovden and Vaxzevria utilize adenoviral vectors (AdV). We described a hamster model of COVID-19 utilizing Wuhan-1 strain SARS-CoV-2, in which vaccine-associated immunopathogenesis can be induced by Alum-adjuvanted Spike protein (Alum+S). Such animals were vaccinated with the authorized vaccines or Alum+S, challenged, and examined. All vaccinated hamsters produced antibodies targeting S. Neutralizing antibodies (nAb) were induced only by authorized vaccines. While nAbs were present after one vaccination with AdV-vaccines, mRNA vaccines needed a boost immunization. Upon challenge, all authorized vaccines protected from severe disease. Less tissue damage and no live virus (one exception) were detectable in the lungs. In contrast, Alum+S immunized hamsters developed VAERD. Our data reveal the absence of induction of VAERD by early commercial vaccines in hamsters, while animals´ immune responses and protection seem to match the clinical vaccine efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19335,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Vaccines","volume":"10 1","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-025-01100-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Four COVID-19 vaccines were developed, tested, and authorized early in Europe and the US. Comirnaty and Spikevax are mRNA-based, whereas Jcovden and Vaxzevria utilize adenoviral vectors (AdV). We described a hamster model of COVID-19 utilizing Wuhan-1 strain SARS-CoV-2, in which vaccine-associated immunopathogenesis can be induced by Alum-adjuvanted Spike protein (Alum+S). Such animals were vaccinated with the authorized vaccines or Alum+S, challenged, and examined. All vaccinated hamsters produced antibodies targeting S. Neutralizing antibodies (nAb) were induced only by authorized vaccines. While nAbs were present after one vaccination with AdV-vaccines, mRNA vaccines needed a boost immunization. Upon challenge, all authorized vaccines protected from severe disease. Less tissue damage and no live virus (one exception) were detectable in the lungs. In contrast, Alum+S immunized hamsters developed VAERD. Our data reveal the absence of induction of VAERD by early commercial vaccines in hamsters, while animals´ immune responses and protection seem to match the clinical vaccine efficacy.

首个获批的西方疫苗对武汉1型攻毒仓鼠无免疫发病机制的保护效果差异
欧洲和美国早期开发、测试并批准了四种COVID-19疫苗。comiry和Spikevax是基于mrna的,而Jcovden和Vaxzevria利用腺病毒载体(AdV)。我们利用武汉-1株SARS-CoV-2建立了一种仓鼠COVID-19模型,在该模型中,铝佐剂刺突蛋白(Alum+S)可诱导疫苗相关免疫发病。这些动物接种了授权疫苗或明矾+S,进行了挑战和检查。所有接种过疫苗的仓鼠都产生了针对S. S.的抗体,中和抗体(nAb)仅由授权疫苗诱导。虽然在一次接种adv疫苗后存在nab,但mRNA疫苗需要加强免疫。面对挑战,所有获得批准的疫苗都能预防严重疾病。肺组织损伤较小,未检测到活病毒(一个例外)。相比之下,明矾+S免疫的仓鼠发生了VAERD。我们的数据显示,早期商业疫苗在仓鼠中没有诱导VAERD,而动物的免疫反应和保护似乎与临床疫苗功效相匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Vaccines
NPJ Vaccines Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
146
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Online-only and open access, npj Vaccines is dedicated to highlighting the most important scientific advances in vaccine research and development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信