Maternity staff views on implementing a national perinatal mortality review tool: understanding barriers and facilitators.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Emily O'Connor, Aenne Helps, Richard Greene, Keelin O'Donoghue, Sara Leitao
{"title":"Maternity staff views on implementing a national perinatal mortality review tool: understanding barriers and facilitators.","authors":"Emily O'Connor, Aenne Helps, Richard Greene, Keelin O'Donoghue, Sara Leitao","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Perinatal death reviews investigate the causes of perinatal mortality, identify potentially avoidable factors, and may help prevent further deaths. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a standardised perinatal mortality review tool in Irish maternity units by engaging with healthcare professionals about their opinions on the existing system and implementing a standardised system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved semi-structured interviews with staff from three maternity units of various sizes in Ireland. Recruitment involved purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews took place from May to December 2022 and covered topics such as the existing perinatal mortality review process, staff experiences with reviews and proposed changes to the system. Thematic analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n=32) included medical and midwifery staff with varying levels of seniority and experience with perinatal mortality reviews. Four themes were identified: the review process, time challenges of reviews, institutional culture and staff needs. Our findings demonstrated that the review process was structured differently across units, with varying levels of staff involvement. Institution culture, leadership and transparency were highlighted as essential aspects of the review process. Reviews have an impact on staff wellbeing, emphasising the need for continued support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing a standardised perinatal mortality review system is viewed positively by staff, though addressing the highlighted barriers to change is important. A standardised perinatal mortality review tool and review process may help strengthen perinatal death reviews, provide more information and opportunity for involvement for bereaved parents and help reduce future perinatal deaths.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Perinatal death reviews investigate the causes of perinatal mortality, identify potentially avoidable factors, and may help prevent further deaths. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a standardised perinatal mortality review tool in Irish maternity units by engaging with healthcare professionals about their opinions on the existing system and implementing a standardised system.

Methods: This study involved semi-structured interviews with staff from three maternity units of various sizes in Ireland. Recruitment involved purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews took place from May to December 2022 and covered topics such as the existing perinatal mortality review process, staff experiences with reviews and proposed changes to the system. Thematic analysis was performed.

Results: Participants (n=32) included medical and midwifery staff with varying levels of seniority and experience with perinatal mortality reviews. Four themes were identified: the review process, time challenges of reviews, institutional culture and staff needs. Our findings demonstrated that the review process was structured differently across units, with varying levels of staff involvement. Institution culture, leadership and transparency were highlighted as essential aspects of the review process. Reviews have an impact on staff wellbeing, emphasising the need for continued support.

Conclusions: Implementing a standardised perinatal mortality review system is viewed positively by staff, though addressing the highlighted barriers to change is important. A standardised perinatal mortality review tool and review process may help strengthen perinatal death reviews, provide more information and opportunity for involvement for bereaved parents and help reduce future perinatal deaths.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信