Recognition, management, and patient perspectives of impulsive-compulsive disorders in Parkinson's disease.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Parkinson's disease Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1177/1877718X251323922
Mirjam Wolfschlag, Gustav Cedergren Weber, Jonathan Timpka, Daniel Weintraub, Per Odin, Anders Håkansson
{"title":"Recognition, management, and patient perspectives of impulsive-compulsive disorders in Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Mirjam Wolfschlag, Gustav Cedergren Weber, Jonathan Timpka, Daniel Weintraub, Per Odin, Anders Håkansson","doi":"10.1177/1877718X251323922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundImpulsive-compulsive disorders (ICDs) are commonly acknowledged as side effects of dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD). While many large-scale studies have focused on prevalences and high-risk treatments, little is known about practical management of ICDs in clinical care and patients' experiences.ObjectiveTo investigate how ICDs are recognized in clinical PD care, clinical features of patients with ICDs, and how patients are impacted by their ICD.MethodsQuestionnaires were sent to all patients who reported ICD symptoms in the Swedish quality register for PD in Skåne County (n = 170) and patients' medical records were screened for mention of ICDs. Core subjects were communication between clinician and patient, course and management of ICDs, and impact on different life domains.ResultsDespite sufficient awareness of the ICD risk during PD treatment, there was limited communication between clinical care staff and patients regarding ICDs. Only 49% of patients had reported their ICD as part of clinical care, and only 14% had been asked about it. Additionally, collaboration with psychiatry was rare (12%). ICD severity increased over time with ongoing PD treatment, and most patients reported a mild to moderate impact of their ICD on close relationships, family, mental and physical health.ConclusionsThis study identified insufficient communication about ICDs as part of clinical care in PD and a very limited involvement of mental health services. Thus, to improve prevention and treatment, ICDs should be recognized, monitored and treated more systematically in routine clinical care, and collaboration with mental health services should be increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":16660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","volume":" ","pages":"585-594"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1877718X251323922","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundImpulsive-compulsive disorders (ICDs) are commonly acknowledged as side effects of dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD). While many large-scale studies have focused on prevalences and high-risk treatments, little is known about practical management of ICDs in clinical care and patients' experiences.ObjectiveTo investigate how ICDs are recognized in clinical PD care, clinical features of patients with ICDs, and how patients are impacted by their ICD.MethodsQuestionnaires were sent to all patients who reported ICD symptoms in the Swedish quality register for PD in Skåne County (n = 170) and patients' medical records were screened for mention of ICDs. Core subjects were communication between clinician and patient, course and management of ICDs, and impact on different life domains.ResultsDespite sufficient awareness of the ICD risk during PD treatment, there was limited communication between clinical care staff and patients regarding ICDs. Only 49% of patients had reported their ICD as part of clinical care, and only 14% had been asked about it. Additionally, collaboration with psychiatry was rare (12%). ICD severity increased over time with ongoing PD treatment, and most patients reported a mild to moderate impact of their ICD on close relationships, family, mental and physical health.ConclusionsThis study identified insufficient communication about ICDs as part of clinical care in PD and a very limited involvement of mental health services. Thus, to improve prevention and treatment, ICDs should be recognized, monitored and treated more systematically in routine clinical care, and collaboration with mental health services should be increased.

帕金森氏症中冲动性强迫症的识别、管理和患者观点。
背景:强迫症(ICDs)通常被认为是多巴胺能治疗帕金森病(PD)的副作用。虽然许多大规模研究集中在患病率和高风险治疗上,但对临床护理和患者经验中icd的实际管理知之甚少。目的探讨ICD在PD临床护理中的认知度、ICD患者的临床特征及ICD对患者的影响。方法对sk内县瑞典PD质量登记系统中报告ICD症状的所有患者(n = 170)进行问卷调查,筛选患者病历中是否提及ICD。核心课题是临床与患者之间的沟通,icd的病程和管理,以及对不同生活领域的影响。结果尽管在PD治疗过程中对ICD风险有足够的认识,但临床护理人员与患者之间关于ICD的沟通有限。只有49%的患者报告他们的ICD是临床护理的一部分,只有14%的患者被问及这一点。此外,与精神病学的合作很少(12%)。随着PD治疗的进行,ICD的严重程度随着时间的推移而增加,大多数患者报告他们的ICD对亲密关系、家庭、精神和身体健康有轻度至中度的影响。结论:本研究发现,作为PD临床护理的一部分,关于icd的沟通不足,心理健康服务的参与非常有限。因此,为了改善预防和治疗,应在常规临床护理中更系统地识别、监测和治疗icd,并应加强与精神卫生服务机构的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.80%
发文量
338
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parkinson''s Disease (JPD) publishes original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine in Parkinson’s disease in cooperation with the Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease. It features a first class Editorial Board and provides rigorous peer review and rapid online publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信