Sex Differences in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Onyou Kim, David Hong, Ki Hong Choi, Joo Myung Lee, Taek Kyu Park, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Yang Hyun Cho, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Jeong Hoon Yang
{"title":"Sex Differences in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.","authors":"Onyou Kim, David Hong, Ki Hong Choi, Joo Myung Lee, Taek Kyu Park, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Yang Hyun Cho, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Jeong Hoon Yang","doi":"10.4070/kcj.2024.0330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Limited data are available on sex differences in clinical outcomes of patients with profound cardiogenic shock (CS) receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Therefore, our study sought to compare clinical pictures and outcomes between male and female patients treated with VA-ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,328 patients receiving VA-ECMO were selected from either the Samsung Medical Center or a multicenter CS registry named the SMART RESCUE study. The study population was divided into men (n=903) and women (n=425). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was procedure-related complications, which included limb ischemia, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) site bleeding and infection, and wound dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (men vs. women, 46.4% vs. 45.6%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.05; p=0.106) based on multivariable analysis. Women showed higher rates of procedure-related complication than men (18.7% vs. 25.9%; adjusted OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.29-2.57; p=0.001) mainly driven by higher incidence of limb ischemia (7.1% vs. 12.9%; adjusted OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.78; p=0.001) On multivariable logistic regression analysis, female sex was an independent predictor of procedure-related complications (adjusted OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.13-2.49; p=0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although no significant difference in either in-hospital or mid-term mortality was found between men and women, female sex is an independent factor for ECMO-related complications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02985008.</p>","PeriodicalId":17850,"journal":{"name":"Korean Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2024.0330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Limited data are available on sex differences in clinical outcomes of patients with profound cardiogenic shock (CS) receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Therefore, our study sought to compare clinical pictures and outcomes between male and female patients treated with VA-ECMO.

Methods: A total of 1,328 patients receiving VA-ECMO were selected from either the Samsung Medical Center or a multicenter CS registry named the SMART RESCUE study. The study population was divided into men (n=903) and women (n=425). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was procedure-related complications, which included limb ischemia, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) site bleeding and infection, and wound dehiscence.

Results: There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (men vs. women, 46.4% vs. 45.6%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.05; p=0.106) based on multivariable analysis. Women showed higher rates of procedure-related complication than men (18.7% vs. 25.9%; adjusted OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.29-2.57; p=0.001) mainly driven by higher incidence of limb ischemia (7.1% vs. 12.9%; adjusted OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.78; p=0.001) On multivariable logistic regression analysis, female sex was an independent predictor of procedure-related complications (adjusted OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.13-2.49; p=0.009).

Conclusions: Although no significant difference in either in-hospital or mid-term mortality was found between men and women, female sex is an independent factor for ECMO-related complications.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02985008.

心源性休克患者接受静脉体外膜氧合的性别差异。
背景和目的:深度心源性休克(CS)患者接受静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)的临床结果的性别差异数据有限。因此,我们的研究试图比较VA-ECMO治疗的男性和女性患者的临床表现和结果。方法:从三星医疗中心或多中心CS注册中心SMART RESCUE研究中选择了1328例接受VA-ECMO的患者。研究人群分为男性(n=903)和女性(n=425)。主要结局是住院死亡率,次要结局是手术相关并发症,包括肢体缺血、体外膜氧合(ECMO)部位出血和感染以及伤口裂开。结果:两组住院死亡率无显著差异(男性vs女性,46.4% vs 45.6%;校正优势比[OR], 0.78;95%置信区间[CI], 0.58-1.05;P =0.106)。女性手术相关并发症发生率高于男性(18.7% vs. 25.9%;调整后OR为1.82;95% ci, 1.29-2.57;P =0.001),主要是由于肢体缺血发生率较高(7.1% vs. 12.9%;调整OR, 2.32;95% ci, 1.42-3.78;p=0.001)在多变量logistic回归分析中,女性是手术相关并发症的独立预测因子(调整OR为1.68;95% ci, 1.13-2.49;p = 0.009)。结论:尽管男性和女性在住院和中期死亡率方面没有显著差异,但女性性别是ecmo相关并发症的独立因素。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02985008。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Circulation Journal
Korean Circulation Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
17.20%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Korean Circulation Journal is the official journal of the Korean Society of Cardiology, the Korean Pediatric Heart Society, the Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology, and the Korean Society of Heart Failure. Abbreviated title is ''Korean Circ J''. Korean Circulation Journal, established in 1971, is a professional, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including original articles of basic research and clinical findings, review articles, editorials, images in cardiovascular medicine, and letters to the editor. Korean Circulation Journal is published monthly in English and publishes scientific and state-of-the-art clinical articles aimed at improving human health in general and contributing to the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases in particular. The journal is published on the official website (https://e-kcj.org). It is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE, Web of Science), Scopus, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, KoreaMed, KoreaMed Synapse and KoMCI, and easily available to wide international researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信