Effect of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block on the Gastrointestinal Function in Patients Undergoing Traumatic Lumbar Spine Fracture surgery: A Retrospective Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S492380
Meizhu Zhao, Mingyang Gao, Xin Zhang, Qi Zhou, Peixia Yu, Chunxiao Liu, Xueyin Song, Xin Shan, Jianglong Dong, Zhihua Li, Qiujun Wang
{"title":"Effect of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block on the Gastrointestinal Function in Patients Undergoing Traumatic Lumbar Spine Fracture surgery: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Meizhu Zhao, Mingyang Gao, Xin Zhang, Qi Zhou, Peixia Yu, Chunxiao Liu, Xueyin Song, Xin Shan, Jianglong Dong, Zhihua Li, Qiujun Wang","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S492380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to explore the effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on the gastrointestinal function in patients after traumatic lumbar fracture surgery and the effects of different levels of block approach.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from electronic medical records of patients who underwent traumatic lumbar spine fracture surgery (September 2022-June 2023). Eligible patients were divided into three groups: group L (bilateral ESPB at L3 level), group T (bilateral ESPB at T12 level) and group C (no block). The primary outcomes were the incidence and the time of occurrence postoperative bloating. We also recorded the time of the first flatus and bowel movement, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), gastrointestinal medications, enema, intraoperative opioid dosage, number of rescue analgesia within 48 h postoperatively, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively, inflammatory mediators, complications and hospital length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>145 patients were included, including 32 in group L, 33 in group T and 80 in group C. Patients in group L and T experienced less bloating compared to group C (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Patients in group T presented bloating significantly later than group L (log rank <i>P</i> < 0.0167). Patients in group L and group T had a significantly shorter time to first flatus and bowel movement, lower incidence of PONV, gastrointestinal medications and enema, and a lower dose of opioid and VAS scores at 24 h postoperatively compared to group C (all <i>P</i> < 0.05), the difference between group L and T was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bilateral ESPB improved postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients with traumatic lumbar spine fracture, where the T12 level of ESPB was more favorable than the L3 level.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1231-1239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S492380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective study aimed to explore the effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on the gastrointestinal function in patients after traumatic lumbar fracture surgery and the effects of different levels of block approach.

Patients and methods: Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from electronic medical records of patients who underwent traumatic lumbar spine fracture surgery (September 2022-June 2023). Eligible patients were divided into three groups: group L (bilateral ESPB at L3 level), group T (bilateral ESPB at T12 level) and group C (no block). The primary outcomes were the incidence and the time of occurrence postoperative bloating. We also recorded the time of the first flatus and bowel movement, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), gastrointestinal medications, enema, intraoperative opioid dosage, number of rescue analgesia within 48 h postoperatively, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively, inflammatory mediators, complications and hospital length of stay (LOS).

Results: 145 patients were included, including 32 in group L, 33 in group T and 80 in group C. Patients in group L and T experienced less bloating compared to group C (P < 0.05). Patients in group T presented bloating significantly later than group L (log rank P < 0.0167). Patients in group L and group T had a significantly shorter time to first flatus and bowel movement, lower incidence of PONV, gastrointestinal medications and enema, and a lower dose of opioid and VAS scores at 24 h postoperatively compared to group C (all P < 0.05), the difference between group L and T was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Bilateral ESPB improved postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients with traumatic lumbar spine fracture, where the T12 level of ESPB was more favorable than the L3 level.

双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞对外伤性腰椎骨折手术患者胃肠功能影响的回顾性研究。
目的:本回顾性研究旨在探讨竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)对外伤性腰椎骨折术后患者胃肠功能的影响及不同程度阻滞入路的影响。患者与方法:回顾性分析2022年9月- 2023年6月外伤性腰椎骨折手术患者电子病历的临床资料。符合条件的患者分为三组:L组(双侧ESPB处于L3水平)、T组(双侧ESPB处于T12水平)和C组(无阻滞)。主要观察指标为术后腹胀的发生率和发生时间。我们还记录了首次放屁和排便时间、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)、胃肠道药物、灌肠、术中阿片类药物剂量、术后48 h内抢救镇痛次数、术后24 h和48 h视觉模拟评分(VAS)、炎症介质、并发症和住院时间(LOS)。结果:共纳入145例患者,其中L组32例,T组33例,C组80例。L组和T组患者腹胀程度均低于C组(P < 0.05)。T组患者出现腹胀的时间明显晚于L组(log rank P < 0.0167)。与C组相比,L组和T组患者首次排气和排便时间明显缩短,术后24 h PONV、胃肠道药物和灌肠发生率均较低,阿片类药物剂量和VAS评分均较低(P < 0.05), L组与T组差异无统计学意义。结论:双侧ESPB可改善外伤性腰椎骨折患者术后胃肠道功能,其中T12水平ESPB优于L3水平ESPB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信