Poonam Yadav, Shyam Kumar Mishra, Sreska Shrestha, Ranjit Sah, Junu Richhinbung Rai, Hari Prasad Kattel, Sangita Sharma, Mark Willcox
{"title":"Multidrug-Resistance and Biofilm Formation among Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from Clinical Specimens.","authors":"Poonam Yadav, Shyam Kumar Mishra, Sreska Shrestha, Ranjit Sah, Junu Richhinbung Rai, Hari Prasad Kattel, Sangita Sharma, Mark Willcox","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i04.4694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as a problematic pathogen due to its ability to become resistant to antibiotics and form biofilms. The aim of this study was to explore antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation, and examine any correlation between these in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted at the 750-bed Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital in Nepal. Identification and antibiotic sensitivity of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were performed following American Society for Microbiology guidelines. Different β-lactamases were detected by standard phenotypic tests. The microtiter plate method was used to screen strains of their ability to form biofilms. Results: Out of total 18,343 clinical samples processed, 4,249 (23.1%) showed bacterial growth. A. baumannii comprised of 4.7% of the total bacterial growth. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) was exhibited by 97.5% of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. All multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were resistant to cephalosporins and carbapenems; however, they were sensitive to polymyxins. Only few isolates showed sensitivity to sulbactam-containing antibiotics (15.4-29.2%), fluoroquinolones (1.0-7.2%), aminoglycosides (2.6-5.6%), and cotrimoxazole (4.1%). Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL), metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and AmpC production were found in 54.9%, 73.3%, 41.5% and 14.9% isolates, respectively. Among all tested isolates, 192 were able to produce biofilms, with 83.1% being classified as strong biofilm producers. Those strains that were resistant to gentamicin were more likely to produce biofilms (P<0.05). ESBL, MBL, KPC and AmpC were seen in 51.8%, 71.6%, 43.8% and 16.0% of strong biofilm producers respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Only polymyxins were effective against Acinetobacter baumannii. Carbapenemase producers were generally strong biofilm producers, and gentamicin resistant strains were more likely to produce biofilms. The findings of this study may help to understand antibiotic-resistance mechanisms and provide valuable information in the treatment of MDR Acinetobacter baumannii infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"22 4","pages":"662-669"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i04.4694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as a problematic pathogen due to its ability to become resistant to antibiotics and form biofilms. The aim of this study was to explore antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation, and examine any correlation between these in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at the 750-bed Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital in Nepal. Identification and antibiotic sensitivity of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were performed following American Society for Microbiology guidelines. Different β-lactamases were detected by standard phenotypic tests. The microtiter plate method was used to screen strains of their ability to form biofilms. Results: Out of total 18,343 clinical samples processed, 4,249 (23.1%) showed bacterial growth. A. baumannii comprised of 4.7% of the total bacterial growth. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) was exhibited by 97.5% of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. All multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were resistant to cephalosporins and carbapenems; however, they were sensitive to polymyxins. Only few isolates showed sensitivity to sulbactam-containing antibiotics (15.4-29.2%), fluoroquinolones (1.0-7.2%), aminoglycosides (2.6-5.6%), and cotrimoxazole (4.1%). Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL), metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and AmpC production were found in 54.9%, 73.3%, 41.5% and 14.9% isolates, respectively. Among all tested isolates, 192 were able to produce biofilms, with 83.1% being classified as strong biofilm producers. Those strains that were resistant to gentamicin were more likely to produce biofilms (P<0.05). ESBL, MBL, KPC and AmpC were seen in 51.8%, 71.6%, 43.8% and 16.0% of strong biofilm producers respectively.
Conclusions: Only polymyxins were effective against Acinetobacter baumannii. Carbapenemase producers were generally strong biofilm producers, and gentamicin resistant strains were more likely to produce biofilms. The findings of this study may help to understand antibiotic-resistance mechanisms and provide valuable information in the treatment of MDR Acinetobacter baumannii infections.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.