Neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with melanoma: A real-life retrospective study

IF 5.5 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Dirk Tomsitz, Petra Zimmermann, Wolfgang G. Kunz, Jens Neumann, Birte J. Siegmund, Bernhard G. Weiss, Teresa Kauke, Wulf Sienel, Lars E. French, Frederick Klauschen, Lucie Heinzerling
{"title":"Neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with melanoma: A real-life retrospective study","authors":"Dirk Tomsitz,&nbsp;Petra Zimmermann,&nbsp;Wolfgang G. Kunz,&nbsp;Jens Neumann,&nbsp;Birte J. Siegmund,&nbsp;Bernhard G. Weiss,&nbsp;Teresa Kauke,&nbsp;Wulf Sienel,&nbsp;Lars E. French,&nbsp;Frederick Klauschen,&nbsp;Lucie Heinzerling","doi":"10.1111/ddg.15632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Neoadjuvant treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab has shown efficacy in melanoma patients with nodal metastases in clinical trials. Real world data on neoadjuvant therapies is lacking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study investigates the effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy in a real-world setting and included all melanoma patients who received combined anti-CTLA4/PD1 immunotherapy prior to resection. Pathologic and radiologic responses as well as treatment-related adverse events were assessed, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared between patients with major pathologic response (mPR) and patients without mPR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 24 patients were analyzed, including patients with distant metastases and patients with prior adjuvant treatment. Median follow-up was 21.5 months. Upon histologic assessment, mPR was achieved in 50% (12/24) of the patients, including two patients with lung metastases and three patients who progressed after prior adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy. Radiologic response after neoadjuvant treatment correlated with mPR. No patient with mPR relapsed during follow-up (median RFS not reached) compared to six out of 12 patients without mPR (median RFS = 13 months, p = 0.005).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Neoadjuvant treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab is effective in real-world patients with different melanoma subtypes, different stages of disease and even advanced primary tumor.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14758,"journal":{"name":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","volume":"23 5","pages":"600-608"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddg.15632","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Neoadjuvant treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab has shown efficacy in melanoma patients with nodal metastases in clinical trials. Real world data on neoadjuvant therapies is lacking.

Patients and Methods

This study investigates the effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy in a real-world setting and included all melanoma patients who received combined anti-CTLA4/PD1 immunotherapy prior to resection. Pathologic and radiologic responses as well as treatment-related adverse events were assessed, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared between patients with major pathologic response (mPR) and patients without mPR.

Results

In total, 24 patients were analyzed, including patients with distant metastases and patients with prior adjuvant treatment. Median follow-up was 21.5 months. Upon histologic assessment, mPR was achieved in 50% (12/24) of the patients, including two patients with lung metastases and three patients who progressed after prior adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy. Radiologic response after neoadjuvant treatment correlated with mPR. No patient with mPR relapsed during follow-up (median RFS not reached) compared to six out of 12 patients without mPR (median RFS = 13 months, p = 0.005).

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab is effective in real-world patients with different melanoma subtypes, different stages of disease and even advanced primary tumor.

免疫检查点抑制剂对黑色素瘤患者的新辅助治疗:一项真实的回顾性研究。
背景:ipilimumab和nivolumab的新辅助治疗在黑色素瘤淋巴结转移患者的临床试验中显示出疗效。关于新辅助治疗的真实世界数据缺乏。患者和方法:本研究调查了现实世界环境下新辅助治疗的有效性,包括所有在切除前接受联合抗ctla4 /PD1免疫治疗的黑色素瘤患者。评估病理和放射反应以及治疗相关不良事件,并比较有主要病理反应(mPR)和无主要病理反应(mPR)患者的无复发生存期(RFS)。结果:共分析了24例患者,包括远处转移患者和既往辅助治疗的患者。中位随访时间为21.5个月。经组织学评估,50%(12/24)的患者实现了mPR,其中包括2例肺转移患者和3例既往辅助抗pd1治疗后进展的患者。新辅助治疗后的放射反应与mPR相关。随访期间没有mPR患者复发(中位RFS未达到),而12例无mPR患者中有6例复发(中位RFS = 13个月,p = 0.005)。结论:ipilimumab和nivolumab的新辅助治疗对现实世界中不同黑色素瘤亚型、不同疾病阶段甚至晚期原发肿瘤患者都是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
406
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The JDDG publishes scientific papers from a wide range of disciplines, such as dermatovenereology, allergology, phlebology, dermatosurgery, dermatooncology, and dermatohistopathology. Also in JDDG: information on medical training, continuing education, a calendar of events, book reviews and society announcements. Papers can be submitted in German or English language. In the print version, all articles are published in German. In the online version, all key articles are published in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信