Wendy Morimoto, Mubarika Alavi, Cynthia I Campbell, Meredith Silverman
{"title":"Monitoring strategies and vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury in patients treated at home.","authors":"Wendy Morimoto, Mubarika Alavi, Cynthia I Campbell, Meredith Silverman","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The 2020 vancomycin consensus guidelines recommend AUC-guided dosing over trough-based dosing to decrease nephrotoxicity. This study was performed to add data comparing these dosing methods in the outpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study compared trough-guided versus AUC-guided dosing in patients receiving vancomycin through two home infusion pharmacies (HIPs). Multivariate analysis was performed to report adjusted relative risks, adjusting for patient demographics and clinical characteristics. Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, had an absolute neutrophil count of ≥1000 cells/mm3, a baseline serum creatinine of <2.0 mg/dL at HIP intake, and ≥7 days of IV vancomycin at home. Primary outcome was rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) events, defined as the number of AKI events per treatment days. Secondary outcomes were rate of 30 day hospital readmission and number of HIP interventions (vancomycin dose changes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred and sixty patients were included (303 trough, 357 AUC). The mean number of AKI events was 0.84 per treatment day for trough-guided versus 0.63 for AUC-guided dosing (P = 0.11). In adjusted models, there were no significant associations between the exposure and AKI events [relative risk (RR) = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.2, P = 0.26], 30 day hospital readmissions (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.8-1.3, P = 0.71) or number of pharmacy interventions (RR = 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.2, P = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in AKI rates among patients receiving vancomycin via trough- or AUC-guided monitoring and dosing through a HIP. Further evaluation is needed to determine how to improve AKI rates using AUC-guided monitoring and dosing among patients receiving vancomycin therapy at home.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The 2020 vancomycin consensus guidelines recommend AUC-guided dosing over trough-based dosing to decrease nephrotoxicity. This study was performed to add data comparing these dosing methods in the outpatient setting.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared trough-guided versus AUC-guided dosing in patients receiving vancomycin through two home infusion pharmacies (HIPs). Multivariate analysis was performed to report adjusted relative risks, adjusting for patient demographics and clinical characteristics. Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, had an absolute neutrophil count of ≥1000 cells/mm3, a baseline serum creatinine of <2.0 mg/dL at HIP intake, and ≥7 days of IV vancomycin at home. Primary outcome was rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) events, defined as the number of AKI events per treatment days. Secondary outcomes were rate of 30 day hospital readmission and number of HIP interventions (vancomycin dose changes).
Results: Six hundred and sixty patients were included (303 trough, 357 AUC). The mean number of AKI events was 0.84 per treatment day for trough-guided versus 0.63 for AUC-guided dosing (P = 0.11). In adjusted models, there were no significant associations between the exposure and AKI events [relative risk (RR) = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.2, P = 0.26], 30 day hospital readmissions (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.8-1.3, P = 0.71) or number of pharmacy interventions (RR = 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.2, P = 0.67).
Conclusions: There was no significant difference in AKI rates among patients receiving vancomycin via trough- or AUC-guided monitoring and dosing through a HIP. Further evaluation is needed to determine how to improve AKI rates using AUC-guided monitoring and dosing among patients receiving vancomycin therapy at home.
目的:2020年万古霉素共识指南推荐auc引导给药,而不是波谷给药,以降低肾毒性。本研究是为了在门诊环境中添加比较这些给药方法的数据。方法:这项回顾性队列研究比较了通过两家家庭输注药房(HIPs)接受万古霉素的患者的低谷引导和auc引导给药。进行多变量分析以报告调整后的相对风险,调整患者人口统计学和临床特征。符合条件的患者年龄≥18岁,绝对中性粒细胞计数≥1000细胞/mm3,基线血清肌酐为。结果:共纳入660例患者(基线303例,AUC 357例)。槽导组平均每治疗日AKI事件数为0.84次,auc引导组为0.63次(P = 0.11)。在调整后的模型中,暴露与AKI事件[相对危险度(RR) = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.2, P = 0.26]、30天住院再入院(RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.8-1.3, P = 0.71)或药物干预次数(RR = 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.2, P = 0.67)之间没有显著关联。结论:在接受万古霉素的患者中,通过通道或auc引导监测和通过HIP给药,AKI发生率无显著差异。在家中接受万古霉素治疗的患者中,需要进一步评估如何使用auc引导的监测和剂量来提高AKI发生率。
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.