{"title":"Evaluation of intra-fractional anatomical variations during liver MRgART under abdominal compression using optical flow calculation.","authors":"Takanori Adachi, Nobutaka Mukumoto, Haruo Inokuchi, Nobunari Hamaura, Mutsumi Yamagishi, Mai Sakagami, Naoki Mukumoto, Kenji Hayashi, Ryo Ogino, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Keiko Shibuya","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the intra-fractional anatomical variations during liver magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) under abdominal compression (AC) using optical flow calculations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 27 consecutive patients who underwent liver MRgART under AC. Overall, 387,566 slices from 145 single-slice cine MR series obtained from 29 different treatment plans were analyzed in the coronal and sagittal planes through tumor centers. After defining the square regions as 12 pixels centered on the isocenter for the tumor and 8 pixels between the inspiratory and expiratory phases, excluding the lung/liver boundary for the diaphragm, the vectors were calculated using Farnebäck optical flow. The intra-fractional superior-inferior (SI) motion range and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) between the position of the tumor and the diaphragm in the coronal (SI<sub>coronal</sub> and RMSE<sub>coronal</sub>) and sagittal planes (SI<sub>sagittal</sub> and RMSE<sub>sagittal</sub>) were classified according to the Couinaud-based tumor regions (segment I+IV, II+III, V+VIII, and VI+VII). Statistical significance was determined using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Holm-Bonferroni corrections (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median SI<sub>coronal</sub> and SI<sub>sagittal</sub> motion ranges of the tumor were 6.1 mm (range, 1.5-18.0 mm) and 8.1 mm (range, 1.0-21.0 mm), respectively (p < 0.05). When classified according to tumor location, segment VI+VII showed the largest difference, with the median SI<sub>coronal</sub> and SI<sub>sagittal</sub> motion ranges of 6.5 mm (range, 2.3-17.7 mm) and 10.6 mm (range, 4.8-21.0 mm), respectively (p < 0.05). The median RMSE<sub>coronal</sub> and RMSE<sub>sagittal</sub> values were the largest in segment VI+VII, showing significant differences of 2.6 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). These differences were due to the sliding motion of dorsally located tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optical flow analysis underestimated the SI motion range in the coronal plane compared with that in the sagittal plane during liver MRgART under AC. Tumor motion should be monitored in the sagittal plane, considering sliding motion of the liver, with individualized margins according to tumor location.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the intra-fractional anatomical variations during liver magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) under abdominal compression (AC) using optical flow calculations.
Methods: This study included 27 consecutive patients who underwent liver MRgART under AC. Overall, 387,566 slices from 145 single-slice cine MR series obtained from 29 different treatment plans were analyzed in the coronal and sagittal planes through tumor centers. After defining the square regions as 12 pixels centered on the isocenter for the tumor and 8 pixels between the inspiratory and expiratory phases, excluding the lung/liver boundary for the diaphragm, the vectors were calculated using Farnebäck optical flow. The intra-fractional superior-inferior (SI) motion range and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) between the position of the tumor and the diaphragm in the coronal (SIcoronal and RMSEcoronal) and sagittal planes (SIsagittal and RMSEsagittal) were classified according to the Couinaud-based tumor regions (segment I+IV, II+III, V+VIII, and VI+VII). Statistical significance was determined using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Holm-Bonferroni corrections (p < 0.05).
Results: The median SIcoronal and SIsagittal motion ranges of the tumor were 6.1 mm (range, 1.5-18.0 mm) and 8.1 mm (range, 1.0-21.0 mm), respectively (p < 0.05). When classified according to tumor location, segment VI+VII showed the largest difference, with the median SIcoronal and SIsagittal motion ranges of 6.5 mm (range, 2.3-17.7 mm) and 10.6 mm (range, 4.8-21.0 mm), respectively (p < 0.05). The median RMSEcoronal and RMSEsagittal values were the largest in segment VI+VII, showing significant differences of 2.6 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). These differences were due to the sliding motion of dorsally located tumors.
Conclusions: Optical flow analysis underestimated the SI motion range in the coronal plane compared with that in the sagittal plane during liver MRgART under AC. Tumor motion should be monitored in the sagittal plane, considering sliding motion of the liver, with individualized margins according to tumor location.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.