A 24-month Analysis of Endothelial Cell Loss at Three Different Positions between Femtosecond Laser-assisted and Conventional Phacoemulsification.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Enkhtuvshin Shirchinjav, Altantsetseg Altansukh M, Jin-Jhe Wang, Kathleen Sheng-Chuan Ma, Adiyabazar Doyodmaa, Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang M, Ning Hung, Wu-Yong Quan, David Hui-Kang Ma
{"title":"A 24-month Analysis of Endothelial Cell Loss at Three Different Positions between Femtosecond Laser-assisted and Conventional Phacoemulsification.","authors":"Enkhtuvshin Shirchinjav, Altantsetseg Altansukh M, Jin-Jhe Wang, Kathleen Sheng-Chuan Ma, Adiyabazar Doyodmaa, Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang M, Ning Hung, Wu-Yong Quan, David Hui-Kang Ma","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare long-term changes in endothelial cell loss (ECL) in different corneal regions after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) or conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients who received a premium IOL via FLACS or CPS were included. Patients with an endothelial count less than 1,500 cells/mm2, NO5/NC5 nuclear sclerosis, and complications during surgery were excluded. All patients were followed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. ECL was measured at different positions of the cornea: Position 1, the corneal center; Position 2, nearest the main corneal incision; and Position 3, the peripheral region opposite the main wound.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>48 eyes in the CPS group and 40 eyes in the FLACS group from 75 patients were included. In both groups, ECL was consistently greater at Position 2, and ECL at Positions 1 and 3 remained relatively stable across all time points. At postoperative 3 months at Position 3: the FLACS group had significantly lower ECL than the CPS group. However, at Position 2, ECL continued to increase until 6 months and then stabilized. No significant differences in other endothelial parameters, including the coefficient of variation, percentage of hexagonal cells, or corneal thickness, were observed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant difference in ECL between FLACS and CPS occurred only in the early postoperative period. ECL was highest near the main wound in both groups; it peaked at 6 months postoperatively and stabilized thereafter.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare long-term changes in endothelial cell loss (ECL) in different corneal regions after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) or conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS).

Setting: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.

Design: Single-center retrospective study.

Methods: Adult patients who received a premium IOL via FLACS or CPS were included. Patients with an endothelial count less than 1,500 cells/mm2, NO5/NC5 nuclear sclerosis, and complications during surgery were excluded. All patients were followed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. ECL was measured at different positions of the cornea: Position 1, the corneal center; Position 2, nearest the main corneal incision; and Position 3, the peripheral region opposite the main wound.

Results: 48 eyes in the CPS group and 40 eyes in the FLACS group from 75 patients were included. In both groups, ECL was consistently greater at Position 2, and ECL at Positions 1 and 3 remained relatively stable across all time points. At postoperative 3 months at Position 3: the FLACS group had significantly lower ECL than the CPS group. However, at Position 2, ECL continued to increase until 6 months and then stabilized. No significant differences in other endothelial parameters, including the coefficient of variation, percentage of hexagonal cells, or corneal thickness, were observed between the two groups.

Conclusions: A significant difference in ECL between FLACS and CPS occurred only in the early postoperative period. ECL was highest near the main wound in both groups; it peaked at 6 months postoperatively and stabilized thereafter.

目的:比较飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)或传统超声乳化手术(CPS)后不同角膜区域内皮细胞损失(ECL)的长期变化:地点:台湾林口长庚纪念医院:单中心回顾性研究:方法:纳入通过 FLACS 或 CPS 接受优质人工晶体的成人患者。排除内皮细胞计数低于 1,500 cells/mm2、NO5/NC5 核硬化和手术并发症的患者。所有患者均在术后 1、3、6、12 和 24 个月接受了随访。在角膜的不同位置测量 ECL:位置1,角膜中心;位置2,最靠近角膜主切口;位置3,与主伤口相对的周边区域:75 名患者中,CPS 组 48 眼,FLACS 组 40 眼。在两组患者中,位置 2 的 ECL 始终较大,而位置 1 和位置 3 的 ECL 在所有时间点都保持相对稳定。术后 3 个月,在位置 3:FLACS 组的 ECL 明显低于 CPS 组。然而,在位置 2,ECL 持续上升直至 6 个月,然后趋于稳定。两组的其他内皮参数,包括变异系数、六角形细胞百分比或角膜厚度,均无明显差异:结论:FLACS和CPS的ECL仅在术后早期存在明显差异。结论:FLACS 和 CPS 的 ECL 仅在术后早期存在显著差异,两组患者的 ECL 在主要伤口附近最高,在术后 6 个月达到峰值,之后趋于稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信