The management of mild neurocognitive disorder in primary care: A Delphi consensus study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Davide Quaranta, Camillo Marra, Enrico Mossello, Alessandro Pirani, Annachiara Cagnin, Federico Adinolfi, Stefano Remiddi
{"title":"The management of mild neurocognitive disorder in primary care: A Delphi consensus study.","authors":"Davide Quaranta, Camillo Marra, Enrico Mossello, Alessandro Pirani, Annachiara Cagnin, Federico Adinolfi, Stefano Remiddi","doi":"10.1177/13872877251322750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundStrategies to identify and treat mild neurocognitive disorder (mild NCD) are still unclear.ObjectiveThe detection and management of mild NCD are crucial to prevent or delay its progression to major NCD, and to help those affected cope with cognitive impairment. The Cartesio Project aimed to reach a consensus on the management of mild NCD in primary care.MethodsThe Advisory Board of five experts (three neurologists, one geriatrician and one general practitioner (GP)), identified four domains of mild NCD: case finding; differential diagnosis; non-pharmacological, and pharmacological intervention. A literature review was performed by consulting the PubMed, PsycNET and Scopus databases from 2017 until August 2022, and guidelines, reviews and meta-analyses on mild NCD were reviewed. A care pathway involving 18 statements was then proposed and voted on by 61 participants (39% neurologists, 31% geriatricians, 25% GPs and 5% psychiatrists).ResultsAgreement was reached on 14 out of 18 statements. The practice of case finding in primary care and the need for a two-level diagnostic approach was supported, including referral to memory clinics. With regard to non-pharmacological treatments, no consensus was reached on nutritional supplementation. There was support for the use of nootropic drug treatments, but not for drugs to treat Alzheimer's disease.ConclusionsThe Cartesio Project developed a consensus to identify the best care for mild NCD. The consensus highlights educational interventions on timely detection and appropriate management of mild NCD in primary care, which may be of relevance for those patients who eventually develop Alzheimer's disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251322750"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251322750","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundStrategies to identify and treat mild neurocognitive disorder (mild NCD) are still unclear.ObjectiveThe detection and management of mild NCD are crucial to prevent or delay its progression to major NCD, and to help those affected cope with cognitive impairment. The Cartesio Project aimed to reach a consensus on the management of mild NCD in primary care.MethodsThe Advisory Board of five experts (three neurologists, one geriatrician and one general practitioner (GP)), identified four domains of mild NCD: case finding; differential diagnosis; non-pharmacological, and pharmacological intervention. A literature review was performed by consulting the PubMed, PsycNET and Scopus databases from 2017 until August 2022, and guidelines, reviews and meta-analyses on mild NCD were reviewed. A care pathway involving 18 statements was then proposed and voted on by 61 participants (39% neurologists, 31% geriatricians, 25% GPs and 5% psychiatrists).ResultsAgreement was reached on 14 out of 18 statements. The practice of case finding in primary care and the need for a two-level diagnostic approach was supported, including referral to memory clinics. With regard to non-pharmacological treatments, no consensus was reached on nutritional supplementation. There was support for the use of nootropic drug treatments, but not for drugs to treat Alzheimer's disease.ConclusionsThe Cartesio Project developed a consensus to identify the best care for mild NCD. The consensus highlights educational interventions on timely detection and appropriate management of mild NCD in primary care, which may be of relevance for those patients who eventually develop Alzheimer's disease.

初级保健中轻度神经认知障碍的管理:德尔菲共识研究。
背景识别和治疗轻度神经认知障碍(轻度NCD)的策略仍不清楚。目的轻度非传染性疾病的发现和管理是预防或延缓其发展为重度非传染性疾病,帮助患者应对认知障碍的关键。Cartesio项目旨在就初级保健中轻度非传染性疾病的管理达成共识。方法由5名专家(3名神经科医生、1名老年科医生和1名全科医生)组成的咨询委员会确定了轻度非传染性疾病的4个领域:病例发现;鉴别诊断;非药物和药物干预。通过查阅2017年至2022年8月PubMed、PsycNET和Scopus数据库进行文献综述,回顾了轻度非传染性疾病的指南、综述和荟萃分析。随后,61名参与者(39%的神经科医生、31%的老年病医生、25%的全科医生和5%的精神科医生)提出了一条包含18项陈述的护理路径,并对其进行了投票。结果18项表述中有14项达成一致。在初级保健中发现病例的做法和需要两级诊断方法得到支持,包括转介到记忆诊所。关于非药物治疗,在营养补充方面没有达成共识。支持使用促智药物治疗,但不支持使用治疗阿尔茨海默病的药物。结论Cartesio项目在确定轻度非传染性疾病的最佳护理方面达成了共识。共识强调了在初级保健中及时发现和适当管理轻度非传染性疾病的教育干预措施,这可能与最终发展为阿尔茨海默病的患者相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信