Effects of HIIT and Sprint Interval Training on Adiposity in Overweight Adults: A Meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Haochong Liu, Qian Li, Wenpu Yang, Eric Tsz-Chun Poon, Haoyang Liu, Dapeng Bao, Indy Man Kit Ho
{"title":"Effects of HIIT and Sprint Interval Training on Adiposity in Overweight Adults: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Haochong Liu, Qian Li, Wenpu Yang, Eric Tsz-Chun Poon, Haoyang Liu, Dapeng Bao, Indy Man Kit Ho","doi":"10.1055/a-2559-8063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training and sprint interval training on body fat reduction in adults with overweight or obesity. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, eight databases were searched, yielding 10 relevant studies involving 343 participants. Both high-intensity interval training and sprint interval training significantly reduced body fat% (standardized mean difference=- 0.56, 95% confidence interval=(- 0.89,-0.24), and <i>p</i>=0.001 and standardized mean difference=- 0.57, 95% confidence interval=(- 0.85,-0.29), and <i>p</i>=0.000, respectively), fat mass (standardized mean difference=- 0.62, 95% confidence interval=(- 1.01,-0.23), and <i>p</i>=0.002 and standardized mean difference=- 0.51, 95% confidence interval=(- 0.81,-0.21), and <i>p</i>=0.001, respectively), and body mass (standardized mean difference=- 0.43, 95% confidence interval=(- 0.75,-0.11), and <i>p</i>=0.009 and standardized mean difference=- 0.34, 95% confidence interval=(- 0.58,-0.10), and <i>p</i>=0.006, respectively). No significant differences were found between high-intensity interval training and sprint interval training in terms of body composition changes. However, the time spent on sprint interval training was approximately 50% less than that of high-intensity interval training. Subgroup analysis suggested that sprint interval training with shorter work durations (less than 10 s) was more effective in obesity control. In conclusion, both high-intensity interval training and sprint interval training demonstrated similar effectiveness in improving body adiposity. Given its time efficiency and straightforward intensity monitoring, sprint interval training may serve as a viable alternative exercise program for promoting fat reduction in adults with overweight or obesity, provided that it is appropriately designed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14439,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2559-8063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training and sprint interval training on body fat reduction in adults with overweight or obesity. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, eight databases were searched, yielding 10 relevant studies involving 343 participants. Both high-intensity interval training and sprint interval training significantly reduced body fat% (standardized mean difference=- 0.56, 95% confidence interval=(- 0.89,-0.24), and p=0.001 and standardized mean difference=- 0.57, 95% confidence interval=(- 0.85,-0.29), and p=0.000, respectively), fat mass (standardized mean difference=- 0.62, 95% confidence interval=(- 1.01,-0.23), and p=0.002 and standardized mean difference=- 0.51, 95% confidence interval=(- 0.81,-0.21), and p=0.001, respectively), and body mass (standardized mean difference=- 0.43, 95% confidence interval=(- 0.75,-0.11), and p=0.009 and standardized mean difference=- 0.34, 95% confidence interval=(- 0.58,-0.10), and p=0.006, respectively). No significant differences were found between high-intensity interval training and sprint interval training in terms of body composition changes. However, the time spent on sprint interval training was approximately 50% less than that of high-intensity interval training. Subgroup analysis suggested that sprint interval training with shorter work durations (less than 10 s) was more effective in obesity control. In conclusion, both high-intensity interval training and sprint interval training demonstrated similar effectiveness in improving body adiposity. Given its time efficiency and straightforward intensity monitoring, sprint interval training may serve as a viable alternative exercise program for promoting fat reduction in adults with overweight or obesity, provided that it is appropriately designed.

HIIT 与短跑间歇训练对超重成年人脂肪含量的影响:一项荟萃分析。
一项荟萃分析比较了高强度间歇训练(HIIT)和冲刺间歇训练(SIT)对超重或肥胖成人体脂减少的影响。按照PRISMA 2020指南,检索了8个数据库,得到10项相关研究,涉及343名参与者。HIIT和SIT均显著降低体脂%(标准化平均差[SMD]=-0.56, 95%可信区间[CI] = (-0.89, -0.24), p= 0.001, SMD=-0.57, 95%可信区间[CI] = (-0.85, -0.29), p= 0.000),脂肪质量(-0.62(-1.01,-0.23),p= 0.002和-0.51 (-0.81,-0.21),p= 0.001),体质量(-0.43 (-0.75,-0.11),p= 0.009和-0.34(-0.58,-0.10),p= 0.006)。在身体成分变化方面,HIIT和SIT之间没有发现显著差异。然而,SIT所花费的时间比HIIT大约少50%。亚组分析表明,较短的工作时间(小于10s)的SIT对肥胖控制更有效。总之,HIIT和SIT在改善身体肥胖方面表现出相似的效果。考虑到它的时间效率和直接的强度监测,如果设计得当,它可以作为一种可行的替代运动计划,促进超重或肥胖的成年人减少脂肪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJSM provides a forum for the publication of papers dealing with both basic and applied information that advance the field of sports medicine and exercise science, and offer a better understanding of biomedicine. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, short communications, and letters to the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信