Gynecology residents' preparedness to perform standard gynecological procedures autonomously: A national survey among French residents and faculty.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Laura Puroski, Sophia Braund, Olivia Guerin, Eric Verspyck, Patrice Crochet, Salma Touleimat
{"title":"Gynecology residents' preparedness to perform standard gynecological procedures autonomously: A national survey among French residents and faculty.","authors":"Laura Puroski, Sophia Braund, Olivia Guerin, Eric Verspyck, Patrice Crochet, Salma Touleimat","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the perceptions of French residents and academic teachers regarding residents' autonomy during training and their preparedness to perform standard gynecological procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national survey of French obstetrics and gynecology residents and their academic teachers was conducted using an online questionnaire distributed in 2023, which gathered opinions on the level of autonomy granted in the operating room for performing standard gynecological procedures and perceptions of preparedness upon graduation. The survey also examined perceptions on the impact of factors that improve surgical autonomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 43% (510/1197) for residents and 31% (42/137) for academic teachers. The opinions of residents and academic teachers regarding residents' surgical preparedness by graduation were similar, except for vaginal hysterectomy (30% vs. 57%, P < 0.001). Residents were thought prepared to perform hysteroscopy and adnexal surgery by laparoscopy by >90% of respondents. Regarding hysterectomy, opinions varied depending on the approach: the only approach for which more than two-thirds of residents (67%) were thought to be prepared by gradation was laparoscopy. Regarding factors promoting surgical autonomy, 99% of residents and 97% of teachers considered case volume and coaching quality essential. Only 37% of residents and 55% of teachers deemed the introduction of summative assessment relevant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>French residents and academic teachers reported adequate preparedness for hysteroscopy and adnexal surgery. There were concerns regarding preparedness for more complex surgeries, particularly laparotomic and vaginal hysterectomy. These findings underscore the need for revisions in training methods and residency objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the perceptions of French residents and academic teachers regarding residents' autonomy during training and their preparedness to perform standard gynecological procedures.

Methods: A national survey of French obstetrics and gynecology residents and their academic teachers was conducted using an online questionnaire distributed in 2023, which gathered opinions on the level of autonomy granted in the operating room for performing standard gynecological procedures and perceptions of preparedness upon graduation. The survey also examined perceptions on the impact of factors that improve surgical autonomy.

Results: The response rate was 43% (510/1197) for residents and 31% (42/137) for academic teachers. The opinions of residents and academic teachers regarding residents' surgical preparedness by graduation were similar, except for vaginal hysterectomy (30% vs. 57%, P < 0.001). Residents were thought prepared to perform hysteroscopy and adnexal surgery by laparoscopy by >90% of respondents. Regarding hysterectomy, opinions varied depending on the approach: the only approach for which more than two-thirds of residents (67%) were thought to be prepared by gradation was laparoscopy. Regarding factors promoting surgical autonomy, 99% of residents and 97% of teachers considered case volume and coaching quality essential. Only 37% of residents and 55% of teachers deemed the introduction of summative assessment relevant.

Conclusion: French residents and academic teachers reported adequate preparedness for hysteroscopy and adnexal surgery. There were concerns regarding preparedness for more complex surgeries, particularly laparotomic and vaginal hysterectomy. These findings underscore the need for revisions in training methods and residency objectives.

妇科住院医师自主执行标准妇科手术的准备情况:一项针对法国住院医师和教师的全国性调查。
目的:本研究旨在探讨法国居民和学术教师对住院医师在培训期间的自主性和他们执行标准妇科手术的准备程度的看法。方法:对法国妇产科住院医师及其学术教师进行全国性调查,于2023年发放在线问卷,收集关于在手术室实施标准妇科手术的自主权水平和毕业准备的看法。该调查还调查了对提高手术自主性因素影响的看法。结果:居民问卷的回复率为43%(510/1197),学术教师问卷的回复率为31%(42/137)。住院医师和学术教师对住院医师毕业前手术准备的意见相似,除了阴道子宫切除术(30%对57%,P 90%)。关于子宫切除术,不同的观点取决于方法:超过三分之二(67%)的居民认为唯一的方法是腹腔镜手术。对于促进手术自主性的因素,99%的住院医师和97%的教师认为病例数量和指导质量是最重要的。只有37%的居民和55%的教师认为总结性评估的引入是相关的。结论:法国居民和学术教师报告了宫腔镜和附件手术的充分准备。对于更复杂的手术,特别是剖腹手术和阴道子宫切除术的准备工作存在担忧。这些发现强调需要修订培训方法和住院医师目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信