Evaluating the necessity of pre-transfusion testing in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Jorge H Nuñez, Berta Escudero, Juan Diego Montenegro, Ernesto Guerra Farfán, Agusti Bartra-Ylla, Francesc Angles-Crespo
{"title":"Evaluating the necessity of pre-transfusion testing in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jorge H Nuñez, Berta Escudero, Juan Diego Montenegro, Ernesto Guerra Farfán, Agusti Bartra-Ylla, Francesc Angles-Crespo","doi":"10.1177/11207000251317891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The unnecessary over-ordering of routine pre-transfusion tests (blood typing, screening, and cross-matching) for surgical cases results in substantial avoidable costs and imposes an undue burden on transfusion services. This study specifically focuses on conducting a systematic review of the literature to assess the necessity of routine pre-transfusion tests before total hip arthroplasty (THA) and aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the outcomes associated with this practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to analyse the study's characteristics, assess the prevalence of over-ordering, defined as ordering more routine pre-transfusion tests than clinically necessary, examine transfusion rates, and evaluate potential cost savings to the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 12,178 patients. Pooled results revealed an 88.1% over-ordering pre-transfusion test rate (95% CI, 0.80-0.96; <i>p</i> < 0.001) among patients undergoing primary THA. The pooled prevalence of hospital transfusion rate was 11.9%, with a percentage of intraoperative transfusion of 0.4% (95% CI, 0.001-0.007; <i>p</i> = 0.007). There were statistically significant differences in preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) levels between patients not requiring 14.1 g/dl (95% CI, 13.2-14.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and those needing transfusion 11.9 g/dl (95% CI, 10.9-12.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The per-patient total cost savings ranged from 2.10 to 191.27 dollars.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that routine pretransfusion testing for all patients undergoing primary THA may be unnecessary. We recommend restricting pre-transfusion test orders to patients with preoperative haemoglobin levels below 12 g/dl specifically in the context of unilateral primary THA, always considering individual patient and surgical risk factors. This focused approach has the potential to yield substantial cost savings for healthcare systems and transfusion services by mitigating the unnecessary over-ordering of pre-transfusion tests associated with these surgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"11207000251317891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000251317891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The unnecessary over-ordering of routine pre-transfusion tests (blood typing, screening, and cross-matching) for surgical cases results in substantial avoidable costs and imposes an undue burden on transfusion services. This study specifically focuses on conducting a systematic review of the literature to assess the necessity of routine pre-transfusion tests before total hip arthroplasty (THA) and aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the outcomes associated with this practice.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to analyse the study's characteristics, assess the prevalence of over-ordering, defined as ordering more routine pre-transfusion tests than clinically necessary, examine transfusion rates, and evaluate potential cost savings to the healthcare system.

Results: The study included 12,178 patients. Pooled results revealed an 88.1% over-ordering pre-transfusion test rate (95% CI, 0.80-0.96; p < 0.001) among patients undergoing primary THA. The pooled prevalence of hospital transfusion rate was 11.9%, with a percentage of intraoperative transfusion of 0.4% (95% CI, 0.001-0.007; p = 0.007). There were statistically significant differences in preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) levels between patients not requiring 14.1 g/dl (95% CI, 13.2-14.9; p < 0.001) and those needing transfusion 11.9 g/dl (95% CI, 10.9-12.9; p < 0.001) (p < 0.001). The per-patient total cost savings ranged from 2.10 to 191.27 dollars.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that routine pretransfusion testing for all patients undergoing primary THA may be unnecessary. We recommend restricting pre-transfusion test orders to patients with preoperative haemoglobin levels below 12 g/dl specifically in the context of unilateral primary THA, always considering individual patient and surgical risk factors. This focused approach has the potential to yield substantial cost savings for healthcare systems and transfusion services by mitigating the unnecessary over-ordering of pre-transfusion tests associated with these surgical procedures.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信