Predicting Healthcare-Associated Infection in Patients with Pneumonia via QuantiFERON®-Monitoring.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infection and Drug Resistance Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IDR.S499765
Taehwa Kim, Eunjeong Son, Min Wook So, Doosoo Jeon, Hye Ju Yeo, Seung Eun Lee, Yun Seong Kim
{"title":"Predicting Healthcare-Associated Infection in Patients with Pneumonia via QuantiFERON<sup>®</sup>-Monitoring.","authors":"Taehwa Kim, Eunjeong Son, Min Wook So, Doosoo Jeon, Hye Ju Yeo, Seung Eun Lee, Yun Seong Kim","doi":"10.2147/IDR.S499765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A functional immune system is essential for recovery from pneumonia; hence, measuring and monitoring immune-status indicators is clinically important. This study aimed to determine whether QuantiFERON monitoring (QMF) could predict healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) according to the immune-status of patients with pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, observational, single-center study, patients ≥19 years hospitalized for pneumonia between October 2020 and November 2021. QFM was performed at hospital admission (D1) and seven days after (D2). Data from 90 patients in the D1 QFM group were analyzed, which was further divided into the non-healthcare-associated infection (non-HCAI, n = 41, 45.6%) and HCAI (n = 49, 54.4%) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The D1 and D2 QFM levels were both significantly higher in the non-HCAI group than in the HCAI group (D1 hCAI vs non-HCAI: 4.40 vs 5.75 IU/mL, D2 hCAI vs non-HCAI: 4.38 vs 6.10 IU/mL). Analysis of the change in D1 and D2 QFM levels by each group showed that D2 QFM levels increased over D1 QFM levels in the non-HCAI group (5.75 vs 6.10 IU/mL), while D2 QFM levels decreased over D1 QFM levels in the HCAI group (4.40 vs 4.38 IU/mL). D1 QFM was consistently negatively correlated with TNF-α and CRP. The integrated analysis of D1 QFM and CCI and D1 QFM and CURB-65 had fair to predict the occurrence of HCAI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QFM can be used to predict the immune-status of patients in the context of healthcare-associated infections. These findings provide important insights into the current understanding of pneumonia treatment and recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13577,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Drug Resistance","volume":"18 ","pages":"1381-1391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S499765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A functional immune system is essential for recovery from pneumonia; hence, measuring and monitoring immune-status indicators is clinically important. This study aimed to determine whether QuantiFERON monitoring (QMF) could predict healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) according to the immune-status of patients with pneumonia.

Methods: Prospective, observational, single-center study, patients ≥19 years hospitalized for pneumonia between October 2020 and November 2021. QFM was performed at hospital admission (D1) and seven days after (D2). Data from 90 patients in the D1 QFM group were analyzed, which was further divided into the non-healthcare-associated infection (non-HCAI, n = 41, 45.6%) and HCAI (n = 49, 54.4%) groups.

Results: The D1 and D2 QFM levels were both significantly higher in the non-HCAI group than in the HCAI group (D1 hCAI vs non-HCAI: 4.40 vs 5.75 IU/mL, D2 hCAI vs non-HCAI: 4.38 vs 6.10 IU/mL). Analysis of the change in D1 and D2 QFM levels by each group showed that D2 QFM levels increased over D1 QFM levels in the non-HCAI group (5.75 vs 6.10 IU/mL), while D2 QFM levels decreased over D1 QFM levels in the HCAI group (4.40 vs 4.38 IU/mL). D1 QFM was consistently negatively correlated with TNF-α and CRP. The integrated analysis of D1 QFM and CCI and D1 QFM and CURB-65 had fair to predict the occurrence of HCAI.

Conclusion: QFM can be used to predict the immune-status of patients in the context of healthcare-associated infections. These findings provide important insights into the current understanding of pneumonia treatment and recovery.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection and Drug Resistance
Infection and Drug Resistance Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: About Journal Editors Peer Reviewers Articles Article Publishing Charges Aims and Scope Call For Papers ISSN: 1178-6973 Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suresh Antony An international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the optimal treatment of infection (bacterial, fungal and viral) and the development and institution of preventative strategies to minimize the development and spread of resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信