Understanding the semantic organization of animal fluency in mild Alzheimer's disease through time-course analysis and LDA topic modelling.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Itaguchi Y, K Waterloo, S H Johnsen, C Rodríguez-Aranda
{"title":"Understanding the semantic organization of animal fluency in mild Alzheimer's disease through time-course analysis and LDA topic modelling.","authors":"Itaguchi Y, K Waterloo, S H Johnsen, C Rodríguez-Aranda","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deterioration of semantic memory represents an important feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD), which has been widely addressed in neuropsychological research. A way to understand semantic integrity in AD patients is through a detailed analysis of verbal fluency (VF) performance. In the present study, we used an innovative methodology that combines measures of between-words latencies together with automatized identification of semantic clusters via Latent Dirichlet Analysis (LDA) to acquire a more precise understanding of the dynamics and semantic organization of VF in patients at early stages of AD. Importantly, and diverging from customary procedures, we included VF errors (i.e., repetitions and intrusions) across analyses. For comparison, a group of healthy older adults and young individuals were also examined. Standard parameters including total correct answers, number of clusters, mean cluster size (MCS), cluster duration, and within and out-of-cluster intervals were calculated. These parameters were expressed as mean values in 1-min VF trials and by calculating mean values in four 15-s time windows. Results for the 1-min trial demonstrated significantly larger mean cluster sizes (MCS) and fewer generated answers in AD patients compared to the healthy groups. No additional group differences were found neither on time intervals (both within and out-of-clusters), nor on the 15-s time windows analyses. These data suggest that the clustering ability of mild AD patients might be affected by executive impairments promoting larger MCS. At the same time, we found similar semantic processes and timings in patients and healthy participants. The main difference resides in the structure of the patients' clusters, which encompassed erroneous answers. We advance the idea that production of errors might not only be a consequence of executive dysfunction or working memory deterioration, but also a sign that associative semantic mechanisms are still active early in the disease, despite an evident loss of information.</p>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":" ","pages":"109126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deterioration of semantic memory represents an important feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD), which has been widely addressed in neuropsychological research. A way to understand semantic integrity in AD patients is through a detailed analysis of verbal fluency (VF) performance. In the present study, we used an innovative methodology that combines measures of between-words latencies together with automatized identification of semantic clusters via Latent Dirichlet Analysis (LDA) to acquire a more precise understanding of the dynamics and semantic organization of VF in patients at early stages of AD. Importantly, and diverging from customary procedures, we included VF errors (i.e., repetitions and intrusions) across analyses. For comparison, a group of healthy older adults and young individuals were also examined. Standard parameters including total correct answers, number of clusters, mean cluster size (MCS), cluster duration, and within and out-of-cluster intervals were calculated. These parameters were expressed as mean values in 1-min VF trials and by calculating mean values in four 15-s time windows. Results for the 1-min trial demonstrated significantly larger mean cluster sizes (MCS) and fewer generated answers in AD patients compared to the healthy groups. No additional group differences were found neither on time intervals (both within and out-of-clusters), nor on the 15-s time windows analyses. These data suggest that the clustering ability of mild AD patients might be affected by executive impairments promoting larger MCS. At the same time, we found similar semantic processes and timings in patients and healthy participants. The main difference resides in the structure of the patients' clusters, which encompassed erroneous answers. We advance the idea that production of errors might not only be a consequence of executive dysfunction or working memory deterioration, but also a sign that associative semantic mechanisms are still active early in the disease, despite an evident loss of information.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信