Combination of Aβ40, Aβ42, and Tau Plasma Levels to Distinguish Amyloid-PET Positive Alzheimer Patients from Normal Controls.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Seungyeop Baek, Jinny Claire Lee, Byung Hyun Byun, Su Yeon Park, Jeong Ho Ha, Kyo Chul Lee, Seung-Hoon Yang, Jun-Seok Lee, Seungpyo Hong, Gyoonhee Han, Sang Moo Lim, YoungSoo Kim, Hye Yun Kim
{"title":"Combination of Aβ40, Aβ42, and Tau Plasma Levels to Distinguish Amyloid-PET Positive Alzheimer Patients from Normal Controls.","authors":"Seungyeop Baek, Jinny Claire Lee, Byung Hyun Byun, Su Yeon Park, Jeong Ho Ha, Kyo Chul Lee, Seung-Hoon Yang, Jun-Seok Lee, Seungpyo Hong, Gyoonhee Han, Sang Moo Lim, YoungSoo Kim, Hye Yun Kim","doi":"10.5607/en25008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alzheimer disease (AD) diagnosis is confirmed using a medley of modalities, such as the detection of amyloid-β (Aβ) neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles with positron electron tomography (PET) or the appraisal of irregularities in cognitive function with examinations. Although these methods have been efficient in confirming AD pathology, the rising demand for earlier intervention during pathogenesis has led researchers to explore the diagnostic potential of fluid biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma. Since CSF sample collection is invasive and limited in quantity, biomarker detection in plasma has become more attractive and modern advancements in technology has permitted more efficient and accurate analysis of plasma biomolecules. In this study, we found that a composite of standard factors, Aβ40 and total tau levels in plasma, divided by the variation factor, plasma Aβ42 level, provide better correlation with amyloid neuroimaging and neuropsychological test results than a level comparison between total tau and Aβ42 in plasma. We collected EDTA-treated blood plasma samples of 53 subjects, of randomly selected 27 AD patients and 26 normal cognition (NC) individuals, who received amyloid-PET scans for plaque quantification, and measured plasma levels of Aβ40, Aβ42, and total tau with digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in a blinded manner. There was difficulty distinguishing AD patients from controls when analyzing biomarkers independently. However, significant differentiation was observed between the two groups when comparing individual ratios of total-tau×Aβ40/Aβ42. Our results indicate that collectively comparing fluctuations of these fluid biomarkers could aid in monitoring AD pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12263,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Neurobiology","volume":"34 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11919640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5607/en25008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alzheimer disease (AD) diagnosis is confirmed using a medley of modalities, such as the detection of amyloid-β (Aβ) neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles with positron electron tomography (PET) or the appraisal of irregularities in cognitive function with examinations. Although these methods have been efficient in confirming AD pathology, the rising demand for earlier intervention during pathogenesis has led researchers to explore the diagnostic potential of fluid biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma. Since CSF sample collection is invasive and limited in quantity, biomarker detection in plasma has become more attractive and modern advancements in technology has permitted more efficient and accurate analysis of plasma biomolecules. In this study, we found that a composite of standard factors, Aβ40 and total tau levels in plasma, divided by the variation factor, plasma Aβ42 level, provide better correlation with amyloid neuroimaging and neuropsychological test results than a level comparison between total tau and Aβ42 in plasma. We collected EDTA-treated blood plasma samples of 53 subjects, of randomly selected 27 AD patients and 26 normal cognition (NC) individuals, who received amyloid-PET scans for plaque quantification, and measured plasma levels of Aβ40, Aβ42, and total tau with digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in a blinded manner. There was difficulty distinguishing AD patients from controls when analyzing biomarkers independently. However, significant differentiation was observed between the two groups when comparing individual ratios of total-tau×Aβ40/Aβ42. Our results indicate that collectively comparing fluctuations of these fluid biomarkers could aid in monitoring AD pathogenesis.

结合Aβ40、Aβ42和Tau血浆水平区分淀粉样蛋白- pet阳性阿尔茨海默病患者与正常对照。
阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断是通过多种方式确认的,例如用正电子电子断层扫描(PET)检测淀粉样蛋白-β (a β)神经斑块和神经原纤维缠结,或通过检查评估认知功能的不规则性。尽管这些方法在确认AD病理方面是有效的,但在发病过程中对早期干预的需求不断增加,促使研究人员探索脑脊液(CSF)和血浆中液体生物标志物的诊断潜力。由于脑脊液样本采集具有侵入性且数量有限,因此血浆中生物标志物的检测变得越来越有吸引力,现代技术的进步使得对血浆生物分子的分析更加有效和准确。在本研究中,我们发现血浆中a β40和总tau水平的标准因子组合除以变异因子血浆a β42水平与淀粉样蛋白神经影像学和神经心理学测试结果的相关性优于血浆中总tau和a β42水平的比较。我们收集了53名受试者的血浆样本,随机选择27名AD患者和26名正常认知(NC)个体,接受淀粉样蛋白pet扫描以定量斑块,并采用盲法数字酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)测量血浆中a β40、a β42和总tau的水平。在独立分析生物标志物时,很难区分AD患者和对照组。然而,当比较total-tau×Aβ40/ a - β42的个体比率时,两组之间存在显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,比较这些液体生物标志物的波动有助于监测AD的发病机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Neurobiology
Experimental Neurobiology Neuroscience-Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Experimental Neurobiology is an international forum for interdisciplinary investigations of the nervous system. The journal aims to publish papers that present novel observations in all fields of neuroscience, encompassing cellular & molecular neuroscience, development/differentiation/plasticity, neurobiology of disease, systems/cognitive/behavioral neuroscience, drug development & industrial application, brain-machine interface, methodologies/tools, and clinical neuroscience. It should be of interest to a broad scientific audience working on the biochemical, molecular biological, cell biological, pharmacological, physiological, psychophysical, clinical, anatomical, cognitive, and biotechnological aspects of neuroscience. The journal publishes both original research articles and review articles. Experimental Neurobiology is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal. The journal is published jointly by The Korean Society for Brain and Neural Sciences & The Korean Society for Neurodegenerative Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信