Bioequivalence Study of Single-Pill Capsule Formulation of Amlodipine Plus Benazepril in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S498337
Haojing Song, Bo Qiu, Xue Sun, Caihui Guo, Yiting Hu, Zhanjun Dong, Yang Liu, Wanjun Bai
{"title":"Bioequivalence Study of Single-Pill Capsule Formulation of Amlodipine Plus Benazepril in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.","authors":"Haojing Song, Bo Qiu, Xue Sun, Caihui Guo, Yiting Hu, Zhanjun Dong, Yang Liu, Wanjun Bai","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S498337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and safety profiles of test and reference amlodipine/benazepril capsules under both fasting and fed states, determine the bioequivalence between the two formulations, and provide sufficient evidence for new drug application.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>The bioequivalence study was conducted utilizing a randomized, open-label design, involving two formulations administered in a single-dose format. Healthy Chinese participants who met the eligibility criteria were administered a single dose of the test or reference amlodipine/benazepril capsule. Blood samples were taken serially for up to 168 hours post-administration during each period, and the plasma levels of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. For bioequivalence evaluation, geometric mean ratios comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters of the test drug with those of the reference drug were calculated along with their corresponding 90% confidence intervals. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the duration of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PK parameters of the test formulation were found to be comparable to those of the reference formulation under both fasting and fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios comparing the test and reference formulations for the peak concentration (Cmax), the area under the curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>), and the area under the curve from time zero to observed infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat fell within the range of 80.00% to 125.00% in both groups. Both formulations were well tolerated by participants, with no serious adverse events reported throughout the trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between the test and reference formulation in healthy individuals was confirmed under both fasting and fed states, meeting regulatory standards set for the study. Both drug formulations demonstrated safety and tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"1853-1868"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S498337","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and safety profiles of test and reference amlodipine/benazepril capsules under both fasting and fed states, determine the bioequivalence between the two formulations, and provide sufficient evidence for new drug application.

Subjects and methods: The bioequivalence study was conducted utilizing a randomized, open-label design, involving two formulations administered in a single-dose format. Healthy Chinese participants who met the eligibility criteria were administered a single dose of the test or reference amlodipine/benazepril capsule. Blood samples were taken serially for up to 168 hours post-administration during each period, and the plasma levels of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. For bioequivalence evaluation, geometric mean ratios comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters of the test drug with those of the reference drug were calculated along with their corresponding 90% confidence intervals. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the duration of the study.

Results: The PK parameters of the test formulation were found to be comparable to those of the reference formulation under both fasting and fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios comparing the test and reference formulations for the peak concentration (Cmax), the area under the curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), and the area under the curve from time zero to observed infinity (AUC0-∞) of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat fell within the range of 80.00% to 125.00% in both groups. Both formulations were well tolerated by participants, with no serious adverse events reported throughout the trial.

Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between the test and reference formulation in healthy individuals was confirmed under both fasting and fed states, meeting regulatory standards set for the study. Both drug formulations demonstrated safety and tolerability.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信