Withdrawal of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure and Improved Ejection Fraction.

IF 35.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Circulation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072855
Christian Basile, Felix Lindberg, Lina Benson, Federica Guidetti, Ulf Dahlström, Massimo Francesco Piepoli, Peter Mol, Raffaele Scorza, Aldo Pietro Maggioni, Lars H Lund, Gianluigi Savarese
{"title":"Withdrawal of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure and Improved Ejection Fraction.","authors":"Christian Basile, Felix Lindberg, Lina Benson, Federica Guidetti, Ulf Dahlström, Massimo Francesco Piepoli, Peter Mol, Raffaele Scorza, Aldo Pietro Maggioni, Lars H Lund, Gianluigi Savarese","doi":"10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited evidence exists on the prognostic role of continuing medical therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) and an ejection fraction (EF) that has improved over time. This study assessed rates of, patient profiles, and associations with morbidity/mortality of renin-angiotensin inhibitors (RASi), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), beta-blockers (BBL), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) withdrawal in patients with HF with improved EF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a first recorded EF <40% and a later EF ≥40% from the Swedish HF registry between June 11, 2000, and December 31, 2023, were included in this retrospective observational study. Withdrawal was defined as a patient on treatment at the first (reduced) but not at the second (improved) registration. The association between withdrawal and time to first cardiovascular mortality/hospitalization for HF with censoring at 1 year was assessed by Cox regression model using overlap weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 8728 patients with HF with improved EF (median age, 70 years [25th to 75th percentile, 61-78], 2611 [29.9%] women), 96%, 94%, and 46% received RASi/ARNi, BBL, and MRA, respectively, when EF was <40%. The withdrawal rates at the time of the improved EF registration were 4.4% for RASi/ARNi, 3.3% for BBL, and 17.2% for MRA. Predictors of withdrawal included lower use of other HF medications, higher EF at the later EF registration, and a longer time between the 2 EF assessments. After weighting, withdrawal was independently associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality/hospitalization for HF by 38% for RASi/ARNi and 36% for MRA, but not for BBL. Withdrawal of BBL was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome in the subgroup of patients with an improved EF of 40% to 49% versus ≥50% (<i>P</i>-interaction 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with HF with improved EF, HF therapy withdrawal was rare. Withdrawing RASi/ARNi and MRA was associated with higher mortality/morbidity at 1 year. No association was found for BBL withdrawal, albeit with a significant heterogeneity for EF at improvement, suggesting better outcomes with continuing BBL only until EF improves up to 50%. These results are hypothesis-generating and highlight the need for randomized controlled trials testing BBL withdrawal in patients with HF with improved EF.</p>","PeriodicalId":10331,"journal":{"name":"Circulation","volume":" ","pages":"931-945"},"PeriodicalIF":35.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072855","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limited evidence exists on the prognostic role of continuing medical therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) and an ejection fraction (EF) that has improved over time. This study assessed rates of, patient profiles, and associations with morbidity/mortality of renin-angiotensin inhibitors (RASi), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), beta-blockers (BBL), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) withdrawal in patients with HF with improved EF.

Methods: Patients with a first recorded EF <40% and a later EF ≥40% from the Swedish HF registry between June 11, 2000, and December 31, 2023, were included in this retrospective observational study. Withdrawal was defined as a patient on treatment at the first (reduced) but not at the second (improved) registration. The association between withdrawal and time to first cardiovascular mortality/hospitalization for HF with censoring at 1 year was assessed by Cox regression model using overlap weighting.

Results: Of 8728 patients with HF with improved EF (median age, 70 years [25th to 75th percentile, 61-78], 2611 [29.9%] women), 96%, 94%, and 46% received RASi/ARNi, BBL, and MRA, respectively, when EF was <40%. The withdrawal rates at the time of the improved EF registration were 4.4% for RASi/ARNi, 3.3% for BBL, and 17.2% for MRA. Predictors of withdrawal included lower use of other HF medications, higher EF at the later EF registration, and a longer time between the 2 EF assessments. After weighting, withdrawal was independently associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality/hospitalization for HF by 38% for RASi/ARNi and 36% for MRA, but not for BBL. Withdrawal of BBL was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome in the subgroup of patients with an improved EF of 40% to 49% versus ≥50% (P-interaction 0.03).

Conclusions: In patients with HF with improved EF, HF therapy withdrawal was rare. Withdrawing RASi/ARNi and MRA was associated with higher mortality/morbidity at 1 year. No association was found for BBL withdrawal, albeit with a significant heterogeneity for EF at improvement, suggesting better outcomes with continuing BBL only until EF improves up to 50%. These results are hypothesis-generating and highlight the need for randomized controlled trials testing BBL withdrawal in patients with HF with improved EF.

心力衰竭和射血分数改善患者退出指南指导药物治疗
背景:对于心力衰竭(HF)和射血分数(EF)随着时间的推移而改善的患者,持续药物治疗对预后的影响证据有限。本研究评估了肾素-血管紧张素抑制剂(RASi)、血管紧张素受体-neprilysin抑制剂(ARNi)、β受体阻滞剂(BBL)和矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)在心衰EF改善患者中的停药率、患者概况以及与发病率/死亡率的相关性。结果:在8728例EF改善的HF患者中(中位年龄70岁[25 - 75个百分点,61-78],女性2611例[29.9%]),当EF为p相互作用0.03时,分别有96%、94%和46%接受了RASi/ARNi、BBL和MRA检测。结论:在EF改善的心衰患者中,心衰治疗退出是罕见的。停用RASi/ARNi和MRA与1年时较高的死亡率/发病率相关。尽管EF改善存在显著的异质性,但没有发现BBL停药与EF改善有关联,这表明持续BBL直到EF改善到50%的结果更好。这些结果产生了假设,并强调需要进行随机对照试验,以测试心力衰竭改善的心衰患者的BBL戒断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation
Circulation 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
45.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
1473
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Circulation is a platform that publishes a diverse range of content related to cardiovascular health and disease. This includes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other contributions spanning observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services, outcomes studies, and advancements in basic and translational research. The journal serves as a vital resource for professionals and researchers in the field of cardiovascular health, providing a comprehensive platform for disseminating knowledge and fostering advancements in the understanding and management of cardiovascular issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信