Guidelines of the International Headache Society for Real-World Evidence studies in migraine and cluster headache.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1177/03331024251318016
Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Nancy van Veelen, Edoardo Caronna, Gloria Vaghi, Marta Torres-Ferrus, Britt W H van der Arend, Peter J Goadsby, Messoud Ashina, Shuu-Jiun Wang, Hans-Christoph Diener, Cristina Tassorelli, Gisela M Terwindt
{"title":"Guidelines of the International Headache Society for Real-World Evidence studies in migraine and cluster headache.","authors":"Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Nancy van Veelen, Edoardo Caronna, Gloria Vaghi, Marta Torres-Ferrus, Britt W H van der Arend, Peter J Goadsby, Messoud Ashina, Shuu-Jiun Wang, Hans-Christoph Diener, Cristina Tassorelli, Gisela M Terwindt","doi":"10.1177/03331024251318016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Real-world evidence studies are an important tool for investigating the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of treatments for headache disorders in clinical practice. These studies use data generated from routine clinical practice from a variety of sources and can help to identify unmet needs in headache care and guide new therapies, including populations not always included in randomized clinical trials of different ages, comorbidities, and concomitant stable treatments. Real-world evidence pertains to the clinical evidence surrounding the utilization, as well as the potential advantages or drawbacks of treatment, which is extracted through an analysis of real-world data. Real-world evidence studies can present unique challenges, including timing of data collection (prospective vs retrospective), data selection, data quality issues and potential biases (selection, confounding factors, etc.). The International Headache Society has developed these guidelines for optimizing the design and conduct of real-world evidence studies, and therefore the strength and reliability of their output.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 3","pages":"3331024251318016"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251318016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Real-world evidence studies are an important tool for investigating the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of treatments for headache disorders in clinical practice. These studies use data generated from routine clinical practice from a variety of sources and can help to identify unmet needs in headache care and guide new therapies, including populations not always included in randomized clinical trials of different ages, comorbidities, and concomitant stable treatments. Real-world evidence pertains to the clinical evidence surrounding the utilization, as well as the potential advantages or drawbacks of treatment, which is extracted through an analysis of real-world data. Real-world evidence studies can present unique challenges, including timing of data collection (prospective vs retrospective), data selection, data quality issues and potential biases (selection, confounding factors, etc.). The International Headache Society has developed these guidelines for optimizing the design and conduct of real-world evidence studies, and therefore the strength and reliability of their output.

国际头痛学会偏头痛和丛集性头痛真实世界证据研究指南。
在临床实践中,真实世界证据研究是研究头痛疾病治疗的有效性、安全性和耐受性的重要工具。这些研究使用从各种来源的常规临床实践中产生的数据,可以帮助确定头痛护理中未满足的需求并指导新的治疗方法,包括不总是包括在不同年龄、合并症和伴随稳定治疗的随机临床试验中的人群。真实世界证据是指通过对真实世界数据的分析而提取出来的有关使用的临床证据,以及治疗的潜在优点或缺点。真实世界的证据研究可能会带来独特的挑战,包括数据收集的时间(前瞻性与回顾性)、数据选择、数据质量问题和潜在的偏差(选择、混淆因素等)。国际头痛学会制定了这些指导方针,以优化现实世界证据研究的设计和实施,从而提高其结果的强度和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信