Orbital Atherectomy in Calcified Coronary Lesions: A 1-Year Retrospective Observational Outcome Study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ayman Helal, Nasir Ahmad, Omar Bajmmal, Javed Ehtisham, Kai Hogrefe, Prashanth Raju, David Sharman, Naeem Shaukat, Mohsin Farooq
{"title":"Orbital Atherectomy in Calcified Coronary Lesions: A 1-Year Retrospective Observational Outcome Study.","authors":"Ayman Helal, Nasir Ahmad, Omar Bajmmal, Javed Ehtisham, Kai Hogrefe, Prashanth Raju, David Sharman, Naeem Shaukat, Mohsin Farooq","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has advanced rapidly since its inception. Not only in stent technology, but there have been advancements in adjunctive tools including intra-coronary imaging, stent delivery tools and calcium modification techniques. The interventional community is well aware of the difficulties posed by calcified coronary lesions and their impact on outcomes. More recently, orbital atherectomy (OA) has seen itself on the fore front of managing such complex and challenging situations.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This retrospective study analyses a 1-year experience of using OA in a high-volume primary PCI center in a UK district general hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient demographics, procedural details, and outcomes, including MACE rates and procedural success, were reviewed in all-comers undergoing OA between January 1 and December 31, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total 53 patients were identified that had undergone OA in a 1-year period. Procedural success was achieved in 98.1% of patients. Thirty-days MACE was 5.7% (three patients). One patient experiencing in-hospital procedural related myocardial infarction and two patients had major bleeding events during the follow up period which is not related to OA. No-flow/slow-flow were observed in seven patients (13.2%), and seven patients (13.2%) experienced coronary dissection that were successfully treated with stent implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OA is a new but safe and effective tool for calcium modification in an all-comers cohort of patients treated in a high-volume UK district general hospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has advanced rapidly since its inception. Not only in stent technology, but there have been advancements in adjunctive tools including intra-coronary imaging, stent delivery tools and calcium modification techniques. The interventional community is well aware of the difficulties posed by calcified coronary lesions and their impact on outcomes. More recently, orbital atherectomy (OA) has seen itself on the fore front of managing such complex and challenging situations.

Aims: This retrospective study analyses a 1-year experience of using OA in a high-volume primary PCI center in a UK district general hospital.

Methods: Patient demographics, procedural details, and outcomes, including MACE rates and procedural success, were reviewed in all-comers undergoing OA between January 1 and December 31, 2024.

Results: A total 53 patients were identified that had undergone OA in a 1-year period. Procedural success was achieved in 98.1% of patients. Thirty-days MACE was 5.7% (three patients). One patient experiencing in-hospital procedural related myocardial infarction and two patients had major bleeding events during the follow up period which is not related to OA. No-flow/slow-flow were observed in seven patients (13.2%), and seven patients (13.2%) experienced coronary dissection that were successfully treated with stent implantation.

Conclusion: OA is a new but safe and effective tool for calcium modification in an all-comers cohort of patients treated in a high-volume UK district general hospital setting.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信