The impact of changes in fibromyalgia diagnosis criteria: using NAMCS data (2010-2019) to identify trends.

IF 2.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Anthony Rubano, Michael R Jiroutek, Susan Avila Misciagno
{"title":"The impact of changes in fibromyalgia diagnosis criteria: using NAMCS data (2010-2019) to identify trends.","authors":"Anthony Rubano, Michael R Jiroutek, Susan Avila Misciagno","doi":"10.1186/s41927-025-00483-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibromyalgia is currently diagnosed under the 2016 research criteria, a combination of the 2010 and 2011 criteria revisions. The current guidelines have led to ongoing misdiagnosis issues dating back to the criteria initially established by the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Given the extensive revisions to the diagnostic criteria in 2016, instances of over-and under-diagnosing as well as measurement errors corresponding to the different diagnostic criteria utilized, the current study sought to investigate changes in the incidence of fibromyalgia diagnoses and the associations between fibromyalgia diagnosis and relevant comorbidities and somatic symptoms of interest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study of adults (18 + years of age) used the most recently available National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) datasets from 2010 to 2019. A plot of annual point estimates of the proportion of visits where fibromyalgia was diagnosed (and associated 95% confidence intervals) was generated. In addition, a multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to assess the relationship of covariates available in the NAMCS on the outcome of fibromyalgia diagnosis (yes/no).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Since the implementation of the 2010 ACR criteria, the percentage of visits resulting in a fibromyalgia diagnosis increased prior to the release of the 2016 criteria, after which a general downward trend was observed. Both rheumatoid arthritis (OR 5.51, 95% CI 2.87-10.58) and depression (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.90-3.58) were found to be strongly associated with a fibromyalgia diagnosis. Other comorbid conditions showed minimal associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the fluctuation in the proportion of NAMCS visits resulting in a fibromyalgia diagnosis post-implementation of the 2016 criteria, the current criteria may not accurately represent the sensitivity to comorbid conditions seen in the 2010 criteria through symptom severity scales. The analysis of comorbidities and somatic symptoms revealed that rheumatoid arthritis and depression continue to be two defining comorbidities in the diagnosis of fibromyalgia; however, diagnostic challenges remain.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9150,"journal":{"name":"BMC Rheumatology","volume":"9 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11917024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-025-00483-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fibromyalgia is currently diagnosed under the 2016 research criteria, a combination of the 2010 and 2011 criteria revisions. The current guidelines have led to ongoing misdiagnosis issues dating back to the criteria initially established by the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Given the extensive revisions to the diagnostic criteria in 2016, instances of over-and under-diagnosing as well as measurement errors corresponding to the different diagnostic criteria utilized, the current study sought to investigate changes in the incidence of fibromyalgia diagnoses and the associations between fibromyalgia diagnosis and relevant comorbidities and somatic symptoms of interest.

Methods: This retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study of adults (18 + years of age) used the most recently available National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) datasets from 2010 to 2019. A plot of annual point estimates of the proportion of visits where fibromyalgia was diagnosed (and associated 95% confidence intervals) was generated. In addition, a multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to assess the relationship of covariates available in the NAMCS on the outcome of fibromyalgia diagnosis (yes/no).

Results: Since the implementation of the 2010 ACR criteria, the percentage of visits resulting in a fibromyalgia diagnosis increased prior to the release of the 2016 criteria, after which a general downward trend was observed. Both rheumatoid arthritis (OR 5.51, 95% CI 2.87-10.58) and depression (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.90-3.58) were found to be strongly associated with a fibromyalgia diagnosis. Other comorbid conditions showed minimal associations.

Conclusions: Based on the fluctuation in the proportion of NAMCS visits resulting in a fibromyalgia diagnosis post-implementation of the 2016 criteria, the current criteria may not accurately represent the sensitivity to comorbid conditions seen in the 2010 criteria through symptom severity scales. The analysis of comorbidities and somatic symptoms revealed that rheumatoid arthritis and depression continue to be two defining comorbidities in the diagnosis of fibromyalgia; however, diagnostic challenges remain.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

纤维肌痛诊断标准变化的影响:使用NAMCS数据(2010-2019)确定趋势
背景:纤维肌痛目前是根据2016年的研究标准诊断的,这是2010年和2011年标准修订的组合。目前的指南导致了持续的误诊问题,可追溯到1990年美国风湿病学会(ACR)最初建立的标准。鉴于2016年对诊断标准的广泛修订,过度和不足诊断的情况以及与所使用的不同诊断标准对应的测量误差,本研究旨在调查纤维肌痛诊断率的变化以及纤维肌痛诊断率与相关合并症和感兴趣的躯体症状之间的关系。方法:这项对成年人(18岁以上)的回顾性、观察性、横断面研究使用了2010年至2019年最新的国家门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)数据集。生成了纤维肌痛诊断就诊比例的年点估计值图(以及相关的95%置信区间)。此外,我们构建了一个多变量logistic回归模型来评估NAMCS中可用的协变量与纤维肌痛诊断结果的关系(是/否)。结果:自2010年ACR标准实施以来,在2016年标准发布之前,因纤维肌痛诊断而就诊的百分比有所增加,之后观察到总体下降趋势。类风湿关节炎(OR 5.51, 95% CI 2.87-10.58)和抑郁症(OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.90-3.58)与纤维肌痛的诊断密切相关。其他合并症表现出最小的相关性。结论:基于2016年标准实施后NAMCS就诊导致纤维肌痛诊断比例的波动,目前的标准可能不能准确地代表2010年标准中通过症状严重程度量表对合共病的敏感性。对合并症和躯体症状的分析显示,类风湿关节炎和抑郁仍然是纤维肌痛诊断的两个决定性合并症;然而,诊断方面的挑战依然存在。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Rheumatology
BMC Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信