Comparative bioavailability study of two oral formulations of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in healthy dogs.

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Kananuch Vasuntrarak, Koranis Patthanachai, Piyawan Charoenlertkul, Suphachai Nuanualsuwan, Henrique Cheng, Nipattra Suanpairintr
{"title":"Comparative bioavailability study of two oral formulations of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in healthy dogs.","authors":"Kananuch Vasuntrarak, Koranis Patthanachai, Piyawan Charoenlertkul, Suphachai Nuanualsuwan, Henrique Cheng, Nipattra Suanpairintr","doi":"10.1186/s12917-025-04649-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid combination (AMX-CA) is a widely used oral antibiotic for companion animals. In Thailand, various AMX-CA formulations are available. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic profiles and relative bioavailability of two AMX-CA formulations using a randomized, two-period, two-treatment crossover design in six healthy Beagle dogs. Each dog received a 250 mg AMX-CA tablet (formulation A or B) at a dosage of 20.5 ± 2.5 mg/kg, with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Blood samples were collected over a 24-h period post-administration, then AMX and CA concentrations were measured using LC-MS/MS. Bioequivalence was assessed based on the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for peak plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>), which required to fall within 80%-125%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative bioavailability of formulation B was 76.5% for AMX and 72.7% for CA, compared to formulation A. Only CA's C<sub>max</sub> met the bioequivalence criteria, while the CIs for AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> of AMX and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> of CA were outside the acceptable range.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bioequivalence between the two formulations was not established, indicating that these formulations are not interchangeable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04649-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid combination (AMX-CA) is a widely used oral antibiotic for companion animals. In Thailand, various AMX-CA formulations are available. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic profiles and relative bioavailability of two AMX-CA formulations using a randomized, two-period, two-treatment crossover design in six healthy Beagle dogs. Each dog received a 250 mg AMX-CA tablet (formulation A or B) at a dosage of 20.5 ± 2.5 mg/kg, with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Blood samples were collected over a 24-h period post-administration, then AMX and CA concentrations were measured using LC-MS/MS. Bioequivalence was assessed based on the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), which required to fall within 80%-125%.

Results: The relative bioavailability of formulation B was 76.5% for AMX and 72.7% for CA, compared to formulation A. Only CA's Cmax met the bioequivalence criteria, while the CIs for AUC0-∞ and Cmax of AMX and AUC0-∞ of CA were outside the acceptable range.

Conclusions: Bioequivalence between the two formulations was not established, indicating that these formulations are not interchangeable.

阿莫西林-克拉维酸两种口服制剂在健康犬体内的生物利用度比较研究。
背景:阿莫西林-克拉维酸组合(AMX-CA)是一种广泛应用于伴侣动物的口服抗生素。在泰国,有多种AMX-CA配方可供选择。本研究采用随机、两期、两治疗交叉设计,在6只健康的Beagle犬中评估和比较两种AMX-CA制剂的药代动力学特征和相对生物利用度。每只狗服用剂量为20.5±2.5 mg/kg的AMX-CA片剂(a或B剂型)250 mg,两次治疗之间有7天的洗脱期。在给药后24小时内采集血样,然后用LC-MS/MS测定AMX和CA的浓度。生物等效性评估依据血浆浓度峰值(Cmax)的90%置信区间(CI)和血浆浓度-时间曲线下推至无穷大的面积(AUC0-∞),其范围应在80%-125%之间。结果:处方B与处方a相比,AMX的相对生物利用度为76.5%,CA的相对生物利用度为72.7%,只有CA的Cmax符合生物等效性标准,而AMX的AUC0-∞、Cmax和CA的AUC0-∞的CIs均在可接受范围之外。结论:未建立两制剂的生物等效性,说明两制剂不可互换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信