Changes in the mechanical properties of tibialis anterior and peroneus longus allograft depending on sterilization method and storage time.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Dénes Faragó, Atilla F Karácsony, Zsanett Orlovits, Karoly Pap, Rita M Kiss
{"title":"Changes in the mechanical properties of tibialis anterior and peroneus longus allograft depending on sterilization method and storage time.","authors":"Dénes Faragó, Atilla F Karácsony, Zsanett Orlovits, Karoly Pap, Rita M Kiss","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.143.BJR-2024-0129.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the present research was to analyze the effects of different sterilization methods and storage times on the mechanical properties (load at first break, strain at first break, maximum load, strain at maximum load, and Young's modulus of elasticity) of different allografts compared to native groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two types of grafts were harvested from human cadavers: 165 tibialis anterior (TA) and 166 peroneus longus (PL) tendons. According to the two types of sterilization methods (γ and electron beam irradiation) or the lack of one, and the six types of storage time (one to six months), 36 groups were created. In addition, we created a 1 to 1 native group, which was not sterilized and stored, tested within four hours of collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the results of tendon type TA compared to TA native group, we observed significant differences at the fifth month of storage for all measured parameters. Load at first break of the frozen values at the fifth month was significantly inferior to the native group (p = 0.034). For strain at first break and strain at maximum load, all sterilization methods were significantly inferior at the fifth month (p = 0.003 to p = 0.009). Maximum load values were significantly superior with E-beam irradiation at the fifth month (p = 0.003), and also significantly higher with γ irradiation at the fifth month (p = 0.009). Young's modulus showed significantly inferior values in the frozen tendons at the fifth month (p = 0.001 to p = 0.003). In tendon type PL, no significant differences were found for any of the tested parameters compared to the native group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that freezing alters mechanical properties via the decrease seen in the ultimate tensile strength. In addition, at the fifth and sixth months of storage, time could notably affect allografts rather than the sterilization procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":"14 3","pages":"270-280"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.143.BJR-2024-0129.R2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the present research was to analyze the effects of different sterilization methods and storage times on the mechanical properties (load at first break, strain at first break, maximum load, strain at maximum load, and Young's modulus of elasticity) of different allografts compared to native groups.

Methods: Two types of grafts were harvested from human cadavers: 165 tibialis anterior (TA) and 166 peroneus longus (PL) tendons. According to the two types of sterilization methods (γ and electron beam irradiation) or the lack of one, and the six types of storage time (one to six months), 36 groups were created. In addition, we created a 1 to 1 native group, which was not sterilized and stored, tested within four hours of collection.

Results: In the results of tendon type TA compared to TA native group, we observed significant differences at the fifth month of storage for all measured parameters. Load at first break of the frozen values at the fifth month was significantly inferior to the native group (p = 0.034). For strain at first break and strain at maximum load, all sterilization methods were significantly inferior at the fifth month (p = 0.003 to p = 0.009). Maximum load values were significantly superior with E-beam irradiation at the fifth month (p = 0.003), and also significantly higher with γ irradiation at the fifth month (p = 0.009). Young's modulus showed significantly inferior values in the frozen tendons at the fifth month (p = 0.001 to p = 0.003). In tendon type PL, no significant differences were found for any of the tested parameters compared to the native group.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that freezing alters mechanical properties via the decrease seen in the ultimate tensile strength. In addition, at the fifth and sixth months of storage, time could notably affect allografts rather than the sterilization procedures.

同种异体胫骨前肌和腓骨长肌移植物力学性能的变化与灭菌方法和保存时间的关系。
目的:分析不同灭菌方法和保存时间对同种异体移植物力学性能(初断载荷、初断应变、最大载荷、最大载荷应变和杨氏弹性模量)的影响。方法:从人尸体上获取两种类型的移植物:165条胫骨前肌(TA)和166条腓骨长肌(PL)肌腱。根据两种灭菌方法(γ和电子束辐照)或缺少一种,以及六种储存时间(1 ~ 6个月),制作36组。此外,我们创建了1对1的本地组,未经灭菌和储存,在收集后4小时内进行测试。结果:在肌腱型TA与TA原生组的结果中,我们观察到所有测量参数在储存第5个月的显著差异。第5个月初破负荷冻结值明显低于原生组(p = 0.034)。对于初断应变和最大负荷应变,所有灭菌方法在第5个月时均显著低于灭菌方法(p = 0.003 ~ p = 0.009)。电子束照射组在第5个月的最大负荷值显著优于γ照射组(p = 0.003), γ照射组在第5个月的最大负荷值也显著高于电子束照射组(p = 0.009)。杨氏模量在第5个月的冷冻肌腱中显示出明显的低值(p = 0.001至p = 0.003)。在肌腱型PL中,与本地组相比,没有发现任何测试参数的显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,冷冻通过降低极限抗拉强度来改变机械性能。此外,在储存的第5个月和第6个月,时间比灭菌程序更明显地影响同种异体移植物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信