Anatomic Suitability for Axillary Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Circulatory Support.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Carlos Alberto Valdes, Kristin Drew, Omar M Sharaf, Mustafa M Ahmed, Alex M Parker, Juan R Vilaro, Juan M Aranda, Michael R Massoomi, R David Anderson, Yomary Jimenez, Mohammad A Z Al-Ani
{"title":"Anatomic Suitability for Axillary Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Circulatory Support.","authors":"Carlos Alberto Valdes, Kristin Drew, Omar M Sharaf, Mustafa M Ahmed, Alex M Parker, Juan R Vilaro, Juan M Aranda, Michael R Massoomi, R David Anderson, Yomary Jimenez, Mohammad A Z Al-Ani","doi":"10.1111/aor.14994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) are commonly used as a bridge to heart transplant (Htx). Although IABPs were designed for transfemoral arterial placement, axillary IABPs (axIABP) allow for continued ambulation and rehabilitation. However, increased rates of device complications with axillary compared to femoral insertion suggest anatomic variations that predispose patients to device failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients who received axIABP as a bridge to HTx between February 2018 and July 2022. Pre-axIABP computed tomography (CT) images were reviewed for all patients, and anatomic features of the axillary and central arteries were measured and correlated with mechanical axIABP complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 patients underwent successful axIABP placement with available pre-insertion CT images, of whom 35 (72.9%) were male. Out of 48 patients, 26 (54.2%) experienced 34 complications, including axIABP rupture (n = 10, 29%), infection (n = 8, 23%), and thrombosis (n = 6, 18%). CTs showed an average axillary artery diameter and depth of 6.79 and 55.6 mm, respectively. The average subclavian artery takeoff angle from the aortic arch was 95.4°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Of the 10 vascular anatomic features measured, there was no association between any single measurement and axIABP complications. However, there may be other structural features not measured by routine CT, technical issues with insertion, and device factors not accounted for in this study that drive axIABP complications. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that normal variations in the measured vascular anatomy should not preclude axIABP use.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14994","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) are commonly used as a bridge to heart transplant (Htx). Although IABPs were designed for transfemoral arterial placement, axillary IABPs (axIABP) allow for continued ambulation and rehabilitation. However, increased rates of device complications with axillary compared to femoral insertion suggest anatomic variations that predispose patients to device failure.

Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients who received axIABP as a bridge to HTx between February 2018 and July 2022. Pre-axIABP computed tomography (CT) images were reviewed for all patients, and anatomic features of the axillary and central arteries were measured and correlated with mechanical axIABP complications.

Results: A total of 48 patients underwent successful axIABP placement with available pre-insertion CT images, of whom 35 (72.9%) were male. Out of 48 patients, 26 (54.2%) experienced 34 complications, including axIABP rupture (n = 10, 29%), infection (n = 8, 23%), and thrombosis (n = 6, 18%). CTs showed an average axillary artery diameter and depth of 6.79 and 55.6 mm, respectively. The average subclavian artery takeoff angle from the aortic arch was 95.4°.

Conclusion: Of the 10 vascular anatomic features measured, there was no association between any single measurement and axIABP complications. However, there may be other structural features not measured by routine CT, technical issues with insertion, and device factors not accounted for in this study that drive axIABP complications. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that normal variations in the measured vascular anatomy should not preclude axIABP use.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信