Effect of remimazolam tosylate on the response to endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia in patients undergoing catheter placement for peritoneal dialysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-02-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/XWSD5681
Jing Zong, Peihua Yuan, Ruijiao Zhang, Shiyin Wu, Mei Liu, Liangchao Qu
{"title":"Effect of remimazolam tosylate on the response to endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia in patients undergoing catheter placement for peritoneal dialysis.","authors":"Jing Zong, Peihua Yuan, Ruijiao Zhang, Shiyin Wu, Mei Liu, Liangchao Qu","doi":"10.62347/XWSD5681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to observe the effects of remimazolam tosylate on the response to endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. Additionally, we seek to determine the 95% effective dose (ED95) of remimazolam tosylate for inhibiting the endotracheal intubation response in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was registered with the China Clinical Trials Center (ChiCTR2200055709), https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=149640. Patients scheduled for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement under general anesthesia at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January and June 2023 were selected. They were randomly assigned into the remimazolam tosylate group (R group) and the propofol group (P group), with 30 patients in each group. After anesthesia induction and subsequent endotracheal intubation, sedation efficacy and adverse reactions were recorded for both groups. Venous blood samples (1 mL) were collected from patients before anesthesia induction and after endotracheal intubation to measure levels of adrenaline and noradrenaline. The modified Dixon sequential method was used to determine the ED95 of remimazolam tosylate for inhibiting the endotracheal intubation response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Levels of adrenaline and noradrenaline decreased significantly after endotracheal intubation in both the R group and P group, with no significant difference. Vital signs were more stable in the R group compared to the P group. Injection pain during anesthesia induction was reported in 3 patients (10%) in the R group, whereas 18 cases (60%) were observed in the P group. The Dixon sequential experiment included a total of 25 patients, with 13 (52%) showing positive responses and 12 (48%) negative responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam tosylate is effective for inhibiting the systemic response to endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. Additionally, the occurrence rate of hypotension and injection pain during anesthesia induction is significantly lower compared to propofol. The ED95 of remimazolam tosylate for inhibiting the endotracheal intubation response in peritoneal dialysis catheter placement patients is 0.332 mg/kg.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 2","pages":"974-982"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/XWSD5681","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to observe the effects of remimazolam tosylate on the response to endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. Additionally, we seek to determine the 95% effective dose (ED95) of remimazolam tosylate for inhibiting the endotracheal intubation response in this patient population.

Methods: This prospective study was registered with the China Clinical Trials Center (ChiCTR2200055709), https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=149640. Patients scheduled for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement under general anesthesia at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January and June 2023 were selected. They were randomly assigned into the remimazolam tosylate group (R group) and the propofol group (P group), with 30 patients in each group. After anesthesia induction and subsequent endotracheal intubation, sedation efficacy and adverse reactions were recorded for both groups. Venous blood samples (1 mL) were collected from patients before anesthesia induction and after endotracheal intubation to measure levels of adrenaline and noradrenaline. The modified Dixon sequential method was used to determine the ED95 of remimazolam tosylate for inhibiting the endotracheal intubation response.

Results: Levels of adrenaline and noradrenaline decreased significantly after endotracheal intubation in both the R group and P group, with no significant difference. Vital signs were more stable in the R group compared to the P group. Injection pain during anesthesia induction was reported in 3 patients (10%) in the R group, whereas 18 cases (60%) were observed in the P group. The Dixon sequential experiment included a total of 25 patients, with 13 (52%) showing positive responses and 12 (48%) negative responses.

Conclusions: Remimazolam tosylate is effective for inhibiting the systemic response to endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. Additionally, the occurrence rate of hypotension and injection pain during anesthesia induction is significantly lower compared to propofol. The ED95 of remimazolam tosylate for inhibiting the endotracheal intubation response in peritoneal dialysis catheter placement patients is 0.332 mg/kg.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信