Modified oral implant restoration improves dental aesthetics, function, and patient satisfaction in maxillary anterior tooth loss.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-02-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/BDFY3122
Fang Liu, Yu-Hong Wang, Yan-Jie Xiong, Yi-Liang Ni
{"title":"Modified oral implant restoration improves dental aesthetics, function, and patient satisfaction in maxillary anterior tooth loss.","authors":"Fang Liu, Yu-Hong Wang, Yan-Jie Xiong, Yi-Liang Ni","doi":"10.62347/BDFY3122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of modified oral implant restoration in patients with maxillary anterior tooth loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 98 patients (119 affected teeth) with maxillary anterior tooth loss from August 2021 to November 2023. Among these, 50 cases (63 affected teeth) received modified oral implant restoration (research group), while 48 cases (56 affected teeth) underwent routine dental restoration (control group). Treatment efficacy, safety, peri-implant bone resorption, periodontal pocket depth, dental aesthetics (Pink Esthetic Score, PES; White Esthetic Score, WES), masticatory function, oral function recovery, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The research group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of excellent and good outcomes, with superior PES and WES scores and greater patient satisfaction compared to the control group. Additionally, the research group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of adverse events, reduced peri-implant bone resorption, and shallower periodontal pocket depths compared to the control group. Furthermore, masticatory function and oral function recovery were also notably better in the research group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modified oral implant restoration for maxillary anterior tooth loss can effectively enhance restoration outcomes, improve dental aesthetics, and promote better masticatory function and patient satisfaction. It also helps prevent peri-implant bone resorption and gingival atrophy, lowers the risk of adverse events, and supports oral function recovery, making it a valuable clinical option.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 2","pages":"983-991"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/BDFY3122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of modified oral implant restoration in patients with maxillary anterior tooth loss.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 98 patients (119 affected teeth) with maxillary anterior tooth loss from August 2021 to November 2023. Among these, 50 cases (63 affected teeth) received modified oral implant restoration (research group), while 48 cases (56 affected teeth) underwent routine dental restoration (control group). Treatment efficacy, safety, peri-implant bone resorption, periodontal pocket depth, dental aesthetics (Pink Esthetic Score, PES; White Esthetic Score, WES), masticatory function, oral function recovery, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

Results: The research group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of excellent and good outcomes, with superior PES and WES scores and greater patient satisfaction compared to the control group. Additionally, the research group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of adverse events, reduced peri-implant bone resorption, and shallower periodontal pocket depths compared to the control group. Furthermore, masticatory function and oral function recovery were also notably better in the research group.

Conclusions: Modified oral implant restoration for maxillary anterior tooth loss can effectively enhance restoration outcomes, improve dental aesthetics, and promote better masticatory function and patient satisfaction. It also helps prevent peri-implant bone resorption and gingival atrophy, lowers the risk of adverse events, and supports oral function recovery, making it a valuable clinical option.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信