Accuracy of 3D CE-MRA combined with ultrasound microbubble angiography for the diagnosis of lower extremity atherosclerotic occlusion.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-02-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/HVBK1487
Junzhi Sang, Chunyu Zhang, Luting Lv, Ying Wang, Tianren Zhao, Xuena E
{"title":"Accuracy of 3D CE-MRA combined with ultrasound microbubble angiography for the diagnosis of lower extremity atherosclerotic occlusion.","authors":"Junzhi Sang, Chunyu Zhang, Luting Lv, Ying Wang, Tianren Zhao, Xuena E","doi":"10.62347/HVBK1487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (3D CE-MRA) and ultrasound microbubble angiography, individually and combined, using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 60 patients diagnosed with lower extremity arterial stenosis occlusion (LEASO) from October 2019 to July 2022. All patients underwent 3D CE-MRA and ultrasound microbubble angiography, collectively assessing 470 arterial segments. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 3D CE-MRA, ultrasound microbubble angiography, and their combination were evaluated compared to DSA findings. Kappa statistics were used to analyze the consistency of combined diagnostic efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included subjects aged 56 to 85 years, with a mean age of 65.42 ± 12.65 years. The diagnostic accuracy of 3D CE-MRA was 91.70%, with sensitivity and specificity of 99.72% and 65.49%, respectively. Ultrasound microbubble angiography revealed an 87.66% accuracy with sensitivity and specificity of 99.13% and 56.35%, respectively. When combined, the diagnostic accuracy was improved to 96.17%, maintaining a sensitivity of 100%, although specificity decreased to 50.44%. The Youden index improved to 96.17%, and the Kappa value of 0.951 indicated excellent agreement, demonstrating superior performance over individual modalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of 3D CE-MRA and ultrasound microbubble angiography exhibits enhanced diagnostic precision for detecting and grading LEASO compared to either modality alone. Despite reduced specificity, the combined approach increases overall diagnostic efficacy, advocating its potential for more comprehensive clinical evaluations. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings and assess their clinical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 2","pages":"818-831"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/HVBK1487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (3D CE-MRA) and ultrasound microbubble angiography, individually and combined, using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard.

Methods: This retrospective study included 60 patients diagnosed with lower extremity arterial stenosis occlusion (LEASO) from October 2019 to July 2022. All patients underwent 3D CE-MRA and ultrasound microbubble angiography, collectively assessing 470 arterial segments. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 3D CE-MRA, ultrasound microbubble angiography, and their combination were evaluated compared to DSA findings. Kappa statistics were used to analyze the consistency of combined diagnostic efficacy.

Results: The cohort included subjects aged 56 to 85 years, with a mean age of 65.42 ± 12.65 years. The diagnostic accuracy of 3D CE-MRA was 91.70%, with sensitivity and specificity of 99.72% and 65.49%, respectively. Ultrasound microbubble angiography revealed an 87.66% accuracy with sensitivity and specificity of 99.13% and 56.35%, respectively. When combined, the diagnostic accuracy was improved to 96.17%, maintaining a sensitivity of 100%, although specificity decreased to 50.44%. The Youden index improved to 96.17%, and the Kappa value of 0.951 indicated excellent agreement, demonstrating superior performance over individual modalities.

Conclusion: The combination of 3D CE-MRA and ultrasound microbubble angiography exhibits enhanced diagnostic precision for detecting and grading LEASO compared to either modality alone. Despite reduced specificity, the combined approach increases overall diagnostic efficacy, advocating its potential for more comprehensive clinical evaluations. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings and assess their clinical implications.

三维CE-MRA联合超声微泡血管造影诊断下肢动脉粥样硬化闭塞的准确性。
目的:以数字减影血管造影(DSA)为金标准,评价三维造影增强磁共振血管造影(3D CE-MRA)和超声微泡血管造影单独和联合的诊断价值。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2019年10月至2022年7月诊断为下肢动脉狭窄闭塞(LEASO)的60例患者。所有患者均行3D CE-MRA和超声微泡血管造影,共评估470个动脉段。将三维CE-MRA、超声微泡血管造影及其联合诊断的准确性、敏感性和特异性与DSA结果进行比较。采用Kappa统计分析联合诊断疗效的一致性。结果:受试者年龄56 ~ 85岁,平均年龄65.42±12.65岁。3D CE-MRA诊断准确率为91.70%,敏感性为99.72%,特异性为65.49%。超声微泡血管造影准确率为87.66%,敏感性为99.13%,特异性为56.35%。联合使用时,诊断准确率提高到96.17%,保持100%的敏感性,但特异性下降到50.44%。约登指数提高到96.17%,Kappa值为0.951,一致性极佳,表现出优于单个方法的效果。结论:3D CE-MRA与超声微泡血管造影相结合对LEASO的检测和分级的诊断精度比单独使用任何一种方式都要高。尽管特异性降低,但联合方法提高了总体诊断效能,提倡其更全面的临床评估潜力。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现并评估其临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信