Endoscopy Sedation Challenges in Patients With Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Focused Review on Propofol and Selective Use of Benzodiazepines.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Miruna V Moraru, Sandica Bucurica, Benjamin N A Proske, Smaranda Stoleru, Aurelian Zugravu, Oana A Coman, Ion Fulga
{"title":"Endoscopy Sedation Challenges in Patients With Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Focused Review on Propofol and Selective Use of Benzodiazepines.","authors":"Miruna V Moraru, Sandica Bucurica, Benjamin N A Proske, Smaranda Stoleru, Aurelian Zugravu, Oana A Coman, Ion Fulga","doi":"10.1097/MJT.0000000000001926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) presents a significant challenge in gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation due to impaired liver function, which alters drug metabolism and increases the risk of adverse effects. In the absence of clear guidelines and specific biomarkers for diagnosis and assessment of HE, there is insufficient evidence to formulate standardized protocols for management, diagnosis, and sedation during endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Areas of uncertainty: </strong>Rigid protocols for sedation are difficult to implement due to wide variation in patient age, comorbidities, and disease severity, which creates a \"gray zone.\" This leaves decisions heavily reliant on the clinician's preference or experience, patient characteristics, and institutional protocols. This review highlights the strengths and limitations of propofol, midazolam, and remimazolam in efforts to improve sedation strategies for endoscopic procedures in patients with HE.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases, keeping in view recent publications. Only primary research studies were considered for this review. Inclusion was based on the relevance of patient side effects, sedation outcomes, and safety profiles, with a particular focus on gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures and their implications in HE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propofol remains preferred in patients with HE, demonstrating manageable cardiovascular and respiratory events without worsening encephalopathy. However, its safety requires careful consideration in this high-risk population. The combination of propofol with adjuncts, such as esketamine, has shown potential in mitigating adverse effects and optimizing sedation protocols in challenging cases. Midazolam, though historically used, is not recommended in HE due to exacerbation of encephalopathy and unfavorable safety profiles. While remimazolam shows promise, no evidence in HE populations precludes definitive conclusions about its efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research should focus on optimizing sedation protocols according to the needs of HE patients, including tools for risk stratification and guidelines considering individual patient profiles. Furthermore, studies must be performed to evaluate remimazolam's outcomes and safety profiles, both as a standalone sedative and in combination with other agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":7760,"journal":{"name":"American journal of therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000001926","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) presents a significant challenge in gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation due to impaired liver function, which alters drug metabolism and increases the risk of adverse effects. In the absence of clear guidelines and specific biomarkers for diagnosis and assessment of HE, there is insufficient evidence to formulate standardized protocols for management, diagnosis, and sedation during endoscopy.

Areas of uncertainty: Rigid protocols for sedation are difficult to implement due to wide variation in patient age, comorbidities, and disease severity, which creates a "gray zone." This leaves decisions heavily reliant on the clinician's preference or experience, patient characteristics, and institutional protocols. This review highlights the strengths and limitations of propofol, midazolam, and remimazolam in efforts to improve sedation strategies for endoscopic procedures in patients with HE.

Data sources: A review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases, keeping in view recent publications. Only primary research studies were considered for this review. Inclusion was based on the relevance of patient side effects, sedation outcomes, and safety profiles, with a particular focus on gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures and their implications in HE.

Results: Propofol remains preferred in patients with HE, demonstrating manageable cardiovascular and respiratory events without worsening encephalopathy. However, its safety requires careful consideration in this high-risk population. The combination of propofol with adjuncts, such as esketamine, has shown potential in mitigating adverse effects and optimizing sedation protocols in challenging cases. Midazolam, though historically used, is not recommended in HE due to exacerbation of encephalopathy and unfavorable safety profiles. While remimazolam shows promise, no evidence in HE populations precludes definitive conclusions about its efficacy and safety.

Conclusions: Future research should focus on optimizing sedation protocols according to the needs of HE patients, including tools for risk stratification and guidelines considering individual patient profiles. Furthermore, studies must be performed to evaluate remimazolam's outcomes and safety profiles, both as a standalone sedative and in combination with other agents.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of therapeutics
American journal of therapeutics PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Therapeutics is an indispensable resource for all prescribing physicians who want to access pharmacological developments in cardiology, infectious disease, oncology, anesthesiology, nephrology, toxicology, and psychotropics without having to sift through stacks of medical journals. The journal features original articles on the latest therapeutic approaches as well as critical articles on the drug approval process and therapeutic reviews covering pharmacokinetics, regulatory affairs, pediatric clinical pharmacology, hypertension, metabolism, and drug delivery systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信