Advancing freshwater conservation: techno-economic study of conventional and closed-circuit reverse osmosis systems in full-scale units with challenging feed water conditions.

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shahram Niazi, Mohsen Karegar Ghavibazoo Jalali
{"title":"Advancing freshwater conservation: techno-economic study of conventional and closed-circuit reverse osmosis systems in full-scale units with challenging feed water conditions.","authors":"Shahram Niazi, Mohsen Karegar Ghavibazoo Jalali","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36221-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This techno-economic study evaluated two approaches for conserving freshwater in full-scale brackish RO units, i.e., conventional secondary RO and closed-circuit RO (CCRO) systems. Three industrial cases with silica-rich, sulfate-rich, and high-salinity waters were analyzed through numerical modeling. Results demonstrated that both secondary RO and CCRO effectively conserved freshwater, with CCRO achieving 5-8% higher recovery rates and being less prone to scaling. However, CCRO recovery was limited by silica and sulfate salts supersaturation and constrained by the maximum operating pressure (41.3 bar) for high-salinity water. CCRO systems required fewer membrane elements, eliminated acid use, and consumed less energy but demanded more pressure vessels, higher antiscalant use, and produced slightly lower permeate quality. Statistical analysis revealed critical operational thresholds for both systems: 83% recovery for multi-stage RO and 89% for CCRO, beyond which performance declines significantly, especially at higher feed salinities. Economically, multi-stage RO consistently exhibited lower capital and total production costs across all case studies, while CCRO's advantages in recovery and energy efficiency were offset by higher capital and chemical expenses. Nevertheless, CCRO remains a potentially competitive option in moderate-salinity conditions if antiscalant consumption is optimized.</p>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36221-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This techno-economic study evaluated two approaches for conserving freshwater in full-scale brackish RO units, i.e., conventional secondary RO and closed-circuit RO (CCRO) systems. Three industrial cases with silica-rich, sulfate-rich, and high-salinity waters were analyzed through numerical modeling. Results demonstrated that both secondary RO and CCRO effectively conserved freshwater, with CCRO achieving 5-8% higher recovery rates and being less prone to scaling. However, CCRO recovery was limited by silica and sulfate salts supersaturation and constrained by the maximum operating pressure (41.3 bar) for high-salinity water. CCRO systems required fewer membrane elements, eliminated acid use, and consumed less energy but demanded more pressure vessels, higher antiscalant use, and produced slightly lower permeate quality. Statistical analysis revealed critical operational thresholds for both systems: 83% recovery for multi-stage RO and 89% for CCRO, beyond which performance declines significantly, especially at higher feed salinities. Economically, multi-stage RO consistently exhibited lower capital and total production costs across all case studies, while CCRO's advantages in recovery and energy efficiency were offset by higher capital and chemical expenses. Nevertheless, CCRO remains a potentially competitive option in moderate-salinity conditions if antiscalant consumption is optimized.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信