Extreme fire severity interacts with seed traits to moderate post-fire species assemblages.

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Michi Sano, Ryan Tangney, Alexandria Thomsen, Mark K J Ooi
{"title":"Extreme fire severity interacts with seed traits to moderate post-fire species assemblages.","authors":"Michi Sano, Ryan Tangney, Alexandria Thomsen, Mark K J Ooi","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Premise: </strong>Climate change is globally pushing fire regimes to new extremes, with unprecedented large-scale severe fires. Persistent soil seed banks are a key mechanism for plant species recovery after fires, but extreme fire severity may generate soil temperatures beyond thresholds seeds are adapted to. Seeds are protected from lethal temperatures through soil burial, with temperatures decreasing with increasing depth. However, smaller seeds, due to their lower mass and corresponding energy stores, are restricted to emerging from shallower depths compared to the depths for larger seeds. We examined recruitment patterns across a landscape-scale gradient of fire severity to determine whether seed mass and dormancy class mediate shifts in community assemblages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 25 sites in wet sclerophyll forests in southeastern Australia that had been burnt at either moderate, high, or extreme severity during the 2019-2020 Black Summer Fires. We measured abundance and calculated density of seedlings from 27 common native shrub species.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extreme severity fires caused significant declines in seedling recruitment. Recruitment patterns differed between dormancy class, with steeper declines in seedling emergence for species with physiologically dormant (PD) than for physically dormant (PY) seeds at extreme fire severity. Relative emergence proportions differed between fire severity and seed size groups for both PY and PD species.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Large-scale extreme severity fires favor larger-seeded species, shifting community composition. Future recurrent extreme fire events could therefore place smaller-seeded species at risk. Seed mass, dormancy class, and other seed traits should be considered when exploring post-fire responses, to better predict impacts on plant species.</p>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":" ","pages":"e70012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise: Climate change is globally pushing fire regimes to new extremes, with unprecedented large-scale severe fires. Persistent soil seed banks are a key mechanism for plant species recovery after fires, but extreme fire severity may generate soil temperatures beyond thresholds seeds are adapted to. Seeds are protected from lethal temperatures through soil burial, with temperatures decreasing with increasing depth. However, smaller seeds, due to their lower mass and corresponding energy stores, are restricted to emerging from shallower depths compared to the depths for larger seeds. We examined recruitment patterns across a landscape-scale gradient of fire severity to determine whether seed mass and dormancy class mediate shifts in community assemblages.

Methods: We surveyed 25 sites in wet sclerophyll forests in southeastern Australia that had been burnt at either moderate, high, or extreme severity during the 2019-2020 Black Summer Fires. We measured abundance and calculated density of seedlings from 27 common native shrub species.

Results: Extreme severity fires caused significant declines in seedling recruitment. Recruitment patterns differed between dormancy class, with steeper declines in seedling emergence for species with physiologically dormant (PD) than for physically dormant (PY) seeds at extreme fire severity. Relative emergence proportions differed between fire severity and seed size groups for both PY and PD species.

Conclusions: Large-scale extreme severity fires favor larger-seeded species, shifting community composition. Future recurrent extreme fire events could therefore place smaller-seeded species at risk. Seed mass, dormancy class, and other seed traits should be considered when exploring post-fire responses, to better predict impacts on plant species.

极端的火灾严重程度与种子性状相互作用,以缓和火灾后的物种组合。
前提:气候变化正在全球范围内推动火灾制度走向新的极端,前所未有的大规模严重火灾。持久的土壤种子库是植物物种在火灾后恢复的关键机制,但极端的火灾可能会使土壤温度超过种子所适应的阈值。通过土壤埋藏,温度随着深度的增加而降低,从而保护种子免受致命温度的影响。然而,由于较小的种子质量和相应的能量储存较低,与较大的种子相比,它们只能从较浅的深度出现。我们研究了火灾严重程度梯度的景观尺度上的招募模式,以确定种子质量和休眠类别是否介导了群落组合的变化。方法:我们调查了澳大利亚东南部湿硬叶林的25个地点,这些地点在2019-2020年的黑色夏季火灾中被中度、高度或极端严重程度烧毁。我们测量了27种常见灌木的幼苗丰度并计算了幼苗密度。结果:极端严重的火灾导致苗木招募显著下降。不同休眠类别间的招募模式不同,在极端火灾严重程度下,生理休眠(PD)种子的出苗率下降幅度大于物理休眠(PY)种子。PY和PD两种植物的相对羽化比例在不同烈度和种子大小组之间存在差异。结论:大规模极端严重火灾有利于大种子物种,改变了群落组成。因此,未来反复发生的极端火灾事件可能会使种子较小的物种处于危险之中。在探索火灾后的反应时,应考虑种子质量、休眠类别和其他种子性状,以更好地预测对植物物种的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信