Gender Differences in Patient-Physician Communication in Ophthalmic Practice, Pre- and Post-Covid 19.

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jasmine S Brown, Sunni Mumford, Dominique A Alexis, Ahmara G Ross, Eve J Higginbotham
{"title":"Gender Differences in Patient-Physician Communication in Ophthalmic Practice, Pre- and Post-Covid 19.","authors":"Jasmine S Brown, Sunni Mumford, Dominique A Alexis, Ahmara G Ross, Eve J Higginbotham","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.03.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Physician communication patterns can increase patient satisfaction and adherence to therapy in the primary care setting. This study investigated gender differences in ophthalmologist communication patterns before and after the Covid-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Messages sent by ophthalmic patients at Penn Medicine from 2017-2022 were collected. Differences in the number of physician messages sent for a given patient, median response length and response time to patient inquiries and messages were examined based on year and physician gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Female ophthalmologists sent longer response messages to their patients (median [25<sup>th</sup>, 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles] response length for women vs. men; 672 [492-965] characters vs. 637 [460, 918] characters; P < .0001) and a higher number of response messages per patient compared to their male counterparts (mean [SD] for women vs. men; 5.5 [2.9] vs. 3.0 [1.5]; P = .04). There was an increase in this gender difference in the peri- and post-Covid 19 period (i.e. 2020-2022) (P = .007). Male ophthalmologists sent a higher percentage of same-day responses from 2017-2020 (P < .0001), while female ophthalmologists sent a higher percentage of same-day responses from 2021-2022 (P < .0001). The largest gender difference in same day responses occurred in 2020 (34% for men vs. 30% for women; (P < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gender differences exist in ophthalmologist communication patterns and the Covid-19 pandemic impacted these differences. Future studies will be helpful in determining the potential association of these specific communication patterns with patient satisfaction assessments, eye health outcomes and physician burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.03.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Physician communication patterns can increase patient satisfaction and adherence to therapy in the primary care setting. This study investigated gender differences in ophthalmologist communication patterns before and after the Covid-19 pandemic.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Messages sent by ophthalmic patients at Penn Medicine from 2017-2022 were collected. Differences in the number of physician messages sent for a given patient, median response length and response time to patient inquiries and messages were examined based on year and physician gender.

Results: Female ophthalmologists sent longer response messages to their patients (median [25th, 75th percentiles] response length for women vs. men; 672 [492-965] characters vs. 637 [460, 918] characters; P < .0001) and a higher number of response messages per patient compared to their male counterparts (mean [SD] for women vs. men; 5.5 [2.9] vs. 3.0 [1.5]; P = .04). There was an increase in this gender difference in the peri- and post-Covid 19 period (i.e. 2020-2022) (P = .007). Male ophthalmologists sent a higher percentage of same-day responses from 2017-2020 (P < .0001), while female ophthalmologists sent a higher percentage of same-day responses from 2021-2022 (P < .0001). The largest gender difference in same day responses occurred in 2020 (34% for men vs. 30% for women; (P < .0001).

Conclusions: Gender differences exist in ophthalmologist communication patterns and the Covid-19 pandemic impacted these differences. Future studies will be helpful in determining the potential association of these specific communication patterns with patient satisfaction assessments, eye health outcomes and physician burnout.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信