Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging features of spontaneous third ventriculostomy in triventricular hydrocephalus.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Serdar Arslan, Ahmet Kursat Karaman, Bora Korkmazer, Emil Hikmat, Ahmet Ustundag, Burak Tahmazoğlu, Ali Metin Kafadar, Osman Kızılkılıç
{"title":"Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging features of spontaneous third ventriculostomy in triventricular hydrocephalus.","authors":"Serdar Arslan, Ahmet Kursat Karaman, Bora Korkmazer, Emil Hikmat, Ahmet Ustundag, Burak Tahmazoğlu, Ali Metin Kafadar, Osman Kızılkılıç","doi":"10.1177/02841851251324925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSpontaneous third ventriculostomy (STV) is considered rare in obstructive hydrocephalus cases.PurposeTo investigate the efficacy of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) and three-dimensional constructive interference in steady-state (3D-CISS) for the diagnosis of STV and the potential changes of various radiological parameters measured in hydrocephalus in cases with STV.Material and MethodsPatients with triventricular hydrocephalus who underwent at least one MRI examination, including PC-MRI and 3D-CISS, between 2010 and 2021 were included. The presence of STV was scored separately on PC-MRI and 3D-CISS as follows: 0 = no evidence of STV; 1 = suspicious findings; and 2 = strong evidence of STV. The total STV score was also created by summing the scores determined on both sequences. Evans' index, third ventricle diameter (TVD), third ventricle height and floor bowing, and height of the interpeduncular cistern were compared between cases with and without STV.ResultsSTV diagnosis was confirmed in 10/187 (5.3%) cases. The first observer detected suspicious findings in four and two patients without a confirmed diagnosis on PC-MRI and 3D-CISS, respectively, while the second detected suspicious findings in three and two patients, respectively. There was a strong correlation between PC-MRI, 3D-CISS, total scoring results, and consensus results (<i>P</i> < 0.001). No significant difference was found in measurements except TVD between the two groups.ConclusionSTV may not be a very rare phenomenon and the combined use of PC-MRI and 3D-CISS for diagnosis may aid in overcoming diagnostic challenges. No significant change can be observed in ventriculomegaly-related parameters in patients with STV.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851251324925"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251324925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSpontaneous third ventriculostomy (STV) is considered rare in obstructive hydrocephalus cases.PurposeTo investigate the efficacy of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) and three-dimensional constructive interference in steady-state (3D-CISS) for the diagnosis of STV and the potential changes of various radiological parameters measured in hydrocephalus in cases with STV.Material and MethodsPatients with triventricular hydrocephalus who underwent at least one MRI examination, including PC-MRI and 3D-CISS, between 2010 and 2021 were included. The presence of STV was scored separately on PC-MRI and 3D-CISS as follows: 0 = no evidence of STV; 1 = suspicious findings; and 2 = strong evidence of STV. The total STV score was also created by summing the scores determined on both sequences. Evans' index, third ventricle diameter (TVD), third ventricle height and floor bowing, and height of the interpeduncular cistern were compared between cases with and without STV.ResultsSTV diagnosis was confirmed in 10/187 (5.3%) cases. The first observer detected suspicious findings in four and two patients without a confirmed diagnosis on PC-MRI and 3D-CISS, respectively, while the second detected suspicious findings in three and two patients, respectively. There was a strong correlation between PC-MRI, 3D-CISS, total scoring results, and consensus results (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in measurements except TVD between the two groups.ConclusionSTV may not be a very rare phenomenon and the combined use of PC-MRI and 3D-CISS for diagnosis may aid in overcoming diagnostic challenges. No significant change can be observed in ventriculomegaly-related parameters in patients with STV.

三脑室脑积水自发性第三脑室造瘘的磁共振成像特征评价。
背景:自发性第三脑室造口术(STV)在梗阻性脑积水病例中被认为是罕见的。目的探讨相对比磁共振成像(PC-MRI)和三维稳态干涉成像(3D-CISS)对STV的诊断价值,以及STV脑积水患者各项放射学参数的潜在变化。材料与方法纳入2010年至2021年间接受至少一次MRI检查(包括PC-MRI和3D-CISS)的三室脑积水患者。在PC-MRI和3D-CISS上分别对STV的存在进行评分:0 =无STV证据;1 =可疑发现;2 = STV的有力证据。总STV得分也通过将两个序列的得分相加而得到。比较有无STV患者的Evans指数、第三脑室直径(TVD)、第三脑室高度、底弓形、室间池高度。结果187例stv确诊病例10例(5.3%)。第一名观察员分别在4名和2名未通过PC-MRI和3D-CISS确诊的患者中发现可疑发现,第二名观察员分别在3名和2名患者中发现可疑发现。PC-MRI、3D-CISS、总评分结果和共识结果之间有很强的相关性(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信