Land Cover and Area Influence Bird Biodiversity in Geographically Isolated Wetlands

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jackson Barratt Heitmann, Brittany M. Mason, Corey T. Callaghan
{"title":"Land Cover and Area Influence Bird Biodiversity in Geographically Isolated Wetlands","authors":"Jackson Barratt Heitmann,&nbsp;Brittany M. Mason,&nbsp;Corey T. Callaghan","doi":"10.1111/ddi.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Geographically isolated wetlands, wetlands surrounded by upland habitat, harbour high amounts of bird biodiversity but are rapidly being lost across the United States. Yet, we do not know which characteristics, such as wetland area or land cover, influence the level of bird biodiversity supported. We assessed the influence of wetland area and local (size of the wetland, 0.001–4.20 km<sup>2</sup>) and landscape (25 km) land cover on bird biodiversity in geographically isolated wetlands.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Conterminous United States.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We quantified the impacts of the wetland area and different land cover on overall bird species richness and richness estimates within five functional groups. We integrated 207 geographically isolated wetlands, selected based on eBird sampling locations with over 100 total checklists. We computed land cover metrics within wetland sites and landscape buffers (25 km) around each site. Using a generalised linear modelling approach, we examined how species richness was impacted by area and six remotely sensed land cover variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Species richness increased with area for all species and functional groups of birds, but aquatic (e.g., ducks) and terrestrial (e.g., wading birds) functional groups had the steepest species–area slopes. Constructed wetlands exhibited a steeper species–area relationship slope compared to natural wetlands. Species richness was negatively correlated with built land cover at the local and landscape scales and was positively associated with flooded vegetation at the local scale and grass cover at the local and landscape scales. All functional group richness estimates responded negatively to build land cover but showed unique responses in their associations with other land cover variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Anthropogenic disturbance at the local and landscape scales significantly reduces species richness. Land managers looking to create or restore wetlands, which have steeper species–area curves, should consider local-scale management changes in flooded vegetation or grass cover to improve habitat for birds.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Geographically isolated wetlands, wetlands surrounded by upland habitat, harbour high amounts of bird biodiversity but are rapidly being lost across the United States. Yet, we do not know which characteristics, such as wetland area or land cover, influence the level of bird biodiversity supported. We assessed the influence of wetland area and local (size of the wetland, 0.001–4.20 km2) and landscape (25 km) land cover on bird biodiversity in geographically isolated wetlands.

Location

Conterminous United States.

Methods

We quantified the impacts of the wetland area and different land cover on overall bird species richness and richness estimates within five functional groups. We integrated 207 geographically isolated wetlands, selected based on eBird sampling locations with over 100 total checklists. We computed land cover metrics within wetland sites and landscape buffers (25 km) around each site. Using a generalised linear modelling approach, we examined how species richness was impacted by area and six remotely sensed land cover variables.

Results

Species richness increased with area for all species and functional groups of birds, but aquatic (e.g., ducks) and terrestrial (e.g., wading birds) functional groups had the steepest species–area slopes. Constructed wetlands exhibited a steeper species–area relationship slope compared to natural wetlands. Species richness was negatively correlated with built land cover at the local and landscape scales and was positively associated with flooded vegetation at the local scale and grass cover at the local and landscape scales. All functional group richness estimates responded negatively to build land cover but showed unique responses in their associations with other land cover variables.

Main Conclusions

Anthropogenic disturbance at the local and landscape scales significantly reduces species richness. Land managers looking to create or restore wetlands, which have steeper species–area curves, should consider local-scale management changes in flooded vegetation or grass cover to improve habitat for birds.

Abstract Image

地理孤立湿地的土地覆盖和面积对鸟类生物多样性的影响
目的地理上孤立的湿地,被高地栖息地包围的湿地,拥有大量的鸟类生物多样性,但在美国各地正在迅速消失。然而,我们不知道哪些特征,如湿地面积或土地覆盖,会影响鸟类生物多样性的支持水平。在地理隔离的湿地中,我们评估了湿地面积、局部(湿地面积0.001 ~ 4.20 km2)和景观(25 km)土地覆盖对鸟类生物多样性的影响。地理位置:毗邻美国。方法量化湿地面积和不同土地覆被对鸟类物种总体丰富度的影响,并对5个功能类群的鸟类物种丰富度进行估算。我们整合了207个地理上孤立的湿地,这些湿地是根据eBird采样地点和超过100个总清单选择的。我们计算了湿地站点和景观缓冲带(25公里)内的土地覆盖指标。利用广义线性建模方法,研究了物种丰富度如何受到面积和6个遥感土地覆盖变量的影响。结果鸟类各物种和功能类群的物种丰富度随面积增加而增加,但水生(如鸭子)和陆生(如涉禽)功能类群的物种-面积斜率最大。人工湿地的物种-面积关系斜率比天然湿地更陡。物种丰富度与局地和景观尺度上的建设土地覆被呈负相关,与局地和景观尺度上的淹没植被和草地覆被呈正相关。所有功能群丰富度估算值对构建土地覆盖呈负相关,但在与其他土地覆盖变量的关联中表现出独特的响应。主要结论人为干扰在局部和景观尺度上显著降低了物种丰富度。湿地有更陡峭的物种-面积曲线,想要创造或恢复湿地的土地管理者应该考虑对被淹没的植被或草地进行局部管理,以改善鸟类的栖息地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diversity and Distributions
Diversity and Distributions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
195
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信