Law Enforcement Agency Practices and Policies for the Investigation of Child Sex Trafficking: Are Agencies Using Victim-Centered Approaches?

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Kimberly J. Mitchell, Jennifer E. O’Brien, Lisa M. Jones, Alli Puchlopek-Adams
{"title":"Law Enforcement Agency Practices and Policies for the Investigation of Child Sex Trafficking: Are Agencies Using Victim-Centered Approaches?","authors":"Kimberly J. Mitchell,&nbsp;Jennifer E. O’Brien,&nbsp;Lisa M. Jones,&nbsp;Alli Puchlopek-Adams","doi":"10.1007/s12103-024-09776-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the past decade, efforts have been made to reform the way in which law enforcement responds to child sex trafficking (CST). Law enforcement agencies are being urged or required to use victim-centered approaches that provide exploited youth with support and services. However, researchers have yet to empirically examine law enforcement’s recognition of CST at the agency-level, their arrest practices, or the services that are being offered to CST victims. We have little information about the utilization and effectiveness of various law enforcement agency policies, practices and training programs related to CST. The National Law Enforcement Agency Child Sex Trafficking (LEA-CST) Study aimed to address these gaps through a national survey of law enforcement agencies around the U.S. The current study reports on mail survey data collected from a sample of 1,306 agencies that provided feedback on the use of up to nine victim-centered approaches to CST at their agency. Data were analyzed along with information about whether their agency investigated at least one case of CST in the year 2021. Almost all agencies (97.5%) said they used or had access to at least one victim-centered approach to CST investigations, with larger agencies reporting a greater number of approaches. Two policies were significantly related to a greater likelihood of investigating at least one case of CST in 2021: Access to a CST-specific task force and access to a CST-specific victim service agency. Findings document a growing orientation to these cases by law enforcement that recognizes youth victimization, with innovative approaches to identification and support. Community collaboration appears to be critical to helping to identify, support and provide justice to CST victims.</p><p>\n <b>Research Summary</b> This study examined law enforcement’s recognition of CST at the agency-level, their arrest practices, and the services that are being offered to CST victims. Among 1,306 agencies across the United States, almost all (97.5%) said they used or had access to at least one victim-centered approach to CST investigations, with larger agencies reporting a greater number of approaches. Two policies were significantly related to a greater likelihood of investigating at least one CST case in 2021: Access to a CST-specific task force and access to a CST-specific victim service agency.</p><p>\n <b>Policy Implications</b> Findings from the current study underscore the importance of victim-centered approaches to CST that feature connections and collaborations across communities. These collaborations champion the wellness of youth who have experienced this unique and egregious form of sexual victimization while simultaneously allowing for criminal investigations to proceed, ideally with minimal re-traumatization of the victim.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51509,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"50 1","pages":"75 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12103-024-09776-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-024-09776-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decade, efforts have been made to reform the way in which law enforcement responds to child sex trafficking (CST). Law enforcement agencies are being urged or required to use victim-centered approaches that provide exploited youth with support and services. However, researchers have yet to empirically examine law enforcement’s recognition of CST at the agency-level, their arrest practices, or the services that are being offered to CST victims. We have little information about the utilization and effectiveness of various law enforcement agency policies, practices and training programs related to CST. The National Law Enforcement Agency Child Sex Trafficking (LEA-CST) Study aimed to address these gaps through a national survey of law enforcement agencies around the U.S. The current study reports on mail survey data collected from a sample of 1,306 agencies that provided feedback on the use of up to nine victim-centered approaches to CST at their agency. Data were analyzed along with information about whether their agency investigated at least one case of CST in the year 2021. Almost all agencies (97.5%) said they used or had access to at least one victim-centered approach to CST investigations, with larger agencies reporting a greater number of approaches. Two policies were significantly related to a greater likelihood of investigating at least one case of CST in 2021: Access to a CST-specific task force and access to a CST-specific victim service agency. Findings document a growing orientation to these cases by law enforcement that recognizes youth victimization, with innovative approaches to identification and support. Community collaboration appears to be critical to helping to identify, support and provide justice to CST victims.

Research Summary This study examined law enforcement’s recognition of CST at the agency-level, their arrest practices, and the services that are being offered to CST victims. Among 1,306 agencies across the United States, almost all (97.5%) said they used or had access to at least one victim-centered approach to CST investigations, with larger agencies reporting a greater number of approaches. Two policies were significantly related to a greater likelihood of investigating at least one CST case in 2021: Access to a CST-specific task force and access to a CST-specific victim service agency.

Policy Implications Findings from the current study underscore the importance of victim-centered approaches to CST that feature connections and collaborations across communities. These collaborations champion the wellness of youth who have experienced this unique and egregious form of sexual victimization while simultaneously allowing for criminal investigations to proceed, ideally with minimal re-traumatization of the victim.

执法机构调查儿童性交易的做法和政策:机构是否使用以受害者为中心的方法?
在过去十年中,为改革执法部门应对儿童性交易的方式作出了努力。正在敦促或要求执法机构采用以受害者为中心的方法,为受剥削青年提供支持和服务。然而,研究人员尚未对执法部门在机构层面上对CST的认识、他们的逮捕做法或向CST受害者提供的服务进行实证研究。我们对与CST相关的各种执法机构政策、实践和培训计划的利用和有效性知之甚少。国家执法机构儿童性贩运(LEA-CST)研究旨在通过对美国各地执法机构的全国调查来解决这些差距。目前的研究报告是从1,306个机构的样本中收集的邮件调查数据,这些机构提供了关于在其机构使用多达九种以受害者为中心的儿童性贩运方法的反馈。对数据进行了分析,并提供了有关其机构在2021年是否调查了至少一起CST病例的信息。几乎所有机构(97.5%)表示,他们至少使用或能够接触到一种以受害者为中心的方法来进行CST调查,规模较大的机构报告的方法数量更多。有两项政策与2021年调查至少一起CST案件的可能性有很大关系:加入专门针对CST的工作队和加入专门针对CST的受害者服务机构。调查结果表明,执法部门越来越重视这些案件,承认青少年受害,并采用创新的方法进行识别和支持。社区合作似乎对帮助查明、支持和为CST受害者伸张正义至关重要。本研究审查了执法部门在机构一级对科技类犯罪的认识、他们的逮捕做法以及向科技类犯罪受害者提供的服务。在全美1306家机构中,几乎所有机构(97.5%)都表示,他们至少使用或有机会使用一种以受害者为中心的方法来进行CST调查,规模较大的机构报告的方法数量更多。有两项政策与2021年调查至少一起CST案件的可能性显著相关:进入CST专门工作组和进入CST专门受害者服务机构。当前研究的结果强调了以受害者为中心的CST方法的重要性,这种方法具有跨社区联系和合作的特点。这些合作为经历过这种独特而恶劣的性侵害形式的青年的健康提供了支持,同时允许进行刑事调查,理想情况下尽量减少受害者的再次创伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Criminal Justice
American Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Criminal Justice, the official journal of the Southern Criminal Justice Association, is a peer reviewed publication; manuscripts go through a blind review process. The focus of the Journal is on a wide array of criminal justice topics and issues. Some of these concerns include items pertaining to the criminal justice process, the formal and informal interplay between system components, problems and solutions experienced by various segments, innovative practices, policy development and implementation, evaluative research, the players engaged in these enterprises, and a wide assortment of other related interests. The American Journal of Criminal Justice publishes original articles that utilize a broad range of methodologies and perspectives when examining crime, law, and criminal justice processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信