Yilin Bao , Xiangtian Meng , Huanjun Liu , Mingchang Wang , Xinle Zhang , Abdul Mounem Mouazen
{"title":"A two-stage algorithm for regional-scale SOC prediction: Eliminating the spatial scale effect between multi-source remote sensing data","authors":"Yilin Bao , Xiangtian Meng , Huanjun Liu , Mingchang Wang , Xinle Zhang , Abdul Mounem Mouazen","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mapping the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) content with high spatial resolution is important for sustainable soil management. Remote sensing variables (RSV) and environmental covariates (ECs) have been widely used for SOC content prediction and mapping. The spatial resolution mismatch between RSV and ECs, where ECs typically have lower resolution, introduces a scale effect. For example, as RSV values vary significantly within a 1 km * 1 km range, incorporating ECs at a 1 km * 1 km resolution may smooth pixel values in the mapping results, thereby compromising prediction accuracy and the mapping results. Currently, few studies have focused on how scale effects affect mapping results. Therefore, the aim of this study is to construct a two-stage algorithm for regional-scale SOC content prediction, which can effectively address the issue of spatial scale inconsistency among remote sensing images and ECs, and then combine this with convolutional neural network (CNN) model to establish a high accuracy and robust SOC content prediction model. A total of 11,841 cloudless Landsat Operational Land Imager images from 2016 to 2021 were obtained to calculate RSV, and climate, soil properties, and terrain variables were employed to reflect ECs. In the two-stage algorithm, the coefficient of variation (CV) of RSV at the spatial resolution of ECs was calculated and divided into three levels of high, medium, and low. Then we determined the level of CV of RSV, at which ECs cannot be added as input variables for SOC content prediction, thus avoiding the scale effects. The results indicated that the prediction accuracy based on RSV and ECs was higher than that based solely on RSV or ECs, while the prediction accuracy based on RSV was higher than that based on ECs. The prediction results of RSV combined with ECs obtained the best performance without considering the variability, with mean RMSE, R<sup>2</sup>, RPIQ, and MAE values of approximately 5.60 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, 0.74, 1.75, and 4.12 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. When the variability was considered, with mean RMSE, R<sup>2</sup>, RPIQ, and MAE values of approximately 4.96 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, 0.78, 2.05, and 3.72 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. It was found that only RSV should be used as input variables in regions with CV> 1, whereas both RSV and ECs should be used in regions with CV< 1. This could improve the prediction accuracy and eliminate the influence of the spatial scale effect of ECs on the mapping results. When the resolution difference between the RSV and ECs is 16 times or more, the influence of the spatial scale effect on the mapping results cannot be ignored. The approach proposed in this study can be applied to any problems of regression using multi-source remote sensing data of different spatial resolution, thus avoiding scale effects on the mapping results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 106552"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725001060","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mapping the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) content with high spatial resolution is important for sustainable soil management. Remote sensing variables (RSV) and environmental covariates (ECs) have been widely used for SOC content prediction and mapping. The spatial resolution mismatch between RSV and ECs, where ECs typically have lower resolution, introduces a scale effect. For example, as RSV values vary significantly within a 1 km * 1 km range, incorporating ECs at a 1 km * 1 km resolution may smooth pixel values in the mapping results, thereby compromising prediction accuracy and the mapping results. Currently, few studies have focused on how scale effects affect mapping results. Therefore, the aim of this study is to construct a two-stage algorithm for regional-scale SOC content prediction, which can effectively address the issue of spatial scale inconsistency among remote sensing images and ECs, and then combine this with convolutional neural network (CNN) model to establish a high accuracy and robust SOC content prediction model. A total of 11,841 cloudless Landsat Operational Land Imager images from 2016 to 2021 were obtained to calculate RSV, and climate, soil properties, and terrain variables were employed to reflect ECs. In the two-stage algorithm, the coefficient of variation (CV) of RSV at the spatial resolution of ECs was calculated and divided into three levels of high, medium, and low. Then we determined the level of CV of RSV, at which ECs cannot be added as input variables for SOC content prediction, thus avoiding the scale effects. The results indicated that the prediction accuracy based on RSV and ECs was higher than that based solely on RSV or ECs, while the prediction accuracy based on RSV was higher than that based on ECs. The prediction results of RSV combined with ECs obtained the best performance without considering the variability, with mean RMSE, R2, RPIQ, and MAE values of approximately 5.60 g kg−1, 0.74, 1.75, and 4.12 g kg−1, respectively. When the variability was considered, with mean RMSE, R2, RPIQ, and MAE values of approximately 4.96 g kg−1, 0.78, 2.05, and 3.72 g kg−1, respectively. It was found that only RSV should be used as input variables in regions with CV> 1, whereas both RSV and ECs should be used in regions with CV< 1. This could improve the prediction accuracy and eliminate the influence of the spatial scale effect of ECs on the mapping results. When the resolution difference between the RSV and ECs is 16 times or more, the influence of the spatial scale effect on the mapping results cannot be ignored. The approach proposed in this study can be applied to any problems of regression using multi-source remote sensing data of different spatial resolution, thus avoiding scale effects on the mapping results.
土壤有机碳(SOC)含量的高空间分辨率空间分布图对土壤可持续管理具有重要意义。遥感变量(RSV)和环境协变量(ECs)被广泛用于土壤有机碳含量的预测和制图。RSV和ec之间的空间分辨率不匹配(ec通常具有较低的分辨率)引入了尺度效应。例如,由于RSV值在1 km * 1 km范围内变化显著,在1 km * 1 km分辨率下合并ECs可能会使制图结果中的像素值平滑,从而影响预测精度和制图结果。目前,很少有研究关注尺度效应对制图结果的影响。因此,本研究的目的是构建一种两阶段的区域尺度有机碳含量预测算法,该算法能有效解决遥感图像与生态系统空间尺度不一致的问题,并将其与卷积神经网络(CNN)模型相结合,建立一个高精度、鲁棒的有机碳含量预测模型。利用2016 - 2021年的11,841幅无云Landsat Operational Land Imager图像计算RSV,并利用气候、土壤性质和地形变量来反映ECs。在两阶段算法中,计算了ECs空间分辨率下RSV的变异系数(CV),并将其分为高、中、低三个级别。然后,我们确定了RSV CV水平,在此水平上,不能将ECs作为输入变量进行SOC含量预测,从而避免了尺度效应。结果表明,基于RSV和ECs的预测精度高于单独基于RSV或ECs的预测精度,而基于RSV的预测精度高于基于ECs的预测精度。在不考虑变异的情况下,RSV联合ECs的预测结果表现最佳,平均RMSE、R2、RPIQ和MAE值分别约为5.60 g kg−1、0.74、1.75和4.12 g kg−1。当考虑变异时,平均RMSE、R2、RPIQ和MAE值分别约为4.96 g kg−1、0.78、2.05和3.72 g kg−1。结果发现,在具有CV>; 1的区域,只应使用RSV作为输入变量,而在具有CV<; 1的区域,应同时使用RSV和ec作为输入变量。这样既可以提高预测精度,又可以消除ECs空间尺度效应对制图结果的影响。当RSV与ECs的分辨率差在16倍以上时,空间尺度效应对制图结果的影响不容忽视。该方法可适用于不同空间分辨率的多源遥感数据回归问题,避免了尺度效应对制图结果的影响。
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.