A modified curve number method for runoff prediction of different soil types in China

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Miaomiao Wang , Yangdong Zhao , Wenhai Shi , Jinle Yu , Tiantian Chen , Jiachi Bao , Wenyi Song , Hongjun Chen
{"title":"A modified curve number method for runoff prediction of different soil types in China","authors":"Miaomiao Wang ,&nbsp;Yangdong Zhao ,&nbsp;Wenhai Shi ,&nbsp;Jinle Yu ,&nbsp;Tiantian Chen ,&nbsp;Jiachi Bao ,&nbsp;Wenyi Song ,&nbsp;Hongjun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.108957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number Model, proposed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), has only one parameter <em>CN</em>, and is a tool for predicting runoff. According to the SCS-CN methodology, soils are categorized into four distinct hydrologic soil groups (HSGs) based on their inherent ability to generate runoff. However, the delineation of these four discrete HSG levels can lead to abrupt shifts in the Curve Number (<em>CN</em>) value as one category transitions to another. To obtain more accurate <em>CN</em> values that better reflect the hydrological soil conditions in China, <em>CN</em> values for each <em>HSG</em> were assessed using both the median method (<em>CN_M</em>) and the least squares fit method (<em>CN_F</em>) based on monitored rainfall-runoff data from 48 sites across China. These values were found to significantly deviate from the curve number values (<em>CN_T</em>) provided in the USDA-SCS handbook. The findings indicated that replacing <em>CN_T</em> with <em>CN_F</em>, derived through the least squares fit method, improved the efficacy of the conventional SCS-CN approach. Nevertheless, <em>CN_F</em> exhibited suboptimal performance within HSGs A and B. The subpar performance could be attributed to the significant variability in <em>CN</em> values observed within each hydrological soil group. Therefore, the proposed model taking the influence of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (<em>K<sub>s</sub></em>) on runoff prediction into account was developed to reflect the influence of <em>CN</em> changes under different soil types. The proposed method underwent a reliability test using data from 44 study sites, and subsequently, it was carried over into the remaining 4 typical sites, employing parameters calibrated using the initial 44 sites data. The proposed method with high <em>NSE</em> and low <em>RMSE</em> values demonstrated remarkable predictive precision for runoff at the sites, surpassing the original SCS-CN approach regardless of using <em>CN_F</em> or <em>CN_T</em>. Hence, the proposed method offers versatility and is advantageous for widespread use across China’s diverse hydrological soil environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 108957"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225002590","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number Model, proposed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), has only one parameter CN, and is a tool for predicting runoff. According to the SCS-CN methodology, soils are categorized into four distinct hydrologic soil groups (HSGs) based on their inherent ability to generate runoff. However, the delineation of these four discrete HSG levels can lead to abrupt shifts in the Curve Number (CN) value as one category transitions to another. To obtain more accurate CN values that better reflect the hydrological soil conditions in China, CN values for each HSG were assessed using both the median method (CN_M) and the least squares fit method (CN_F) based on monitored rainfall-runoff data from 48 sites across China. These values were found to significantly deviate from the curve number values (CN_T) provided in the USDA-SCS handbook. The findings indicated that replacing CN_T with CN_F, derived through the least squares fit method, improved the efficacy of the conventional SCS-CN approach. Nevertheless, CN_F exhibited suboptimal performance within HSGs A and B. The subpar performance could be attributed to the significant variability in CN values observed within each hydrological soil group. Therefore, the proposed model taking the influence of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) on runoff prediction into account was developed to reflect the influence of CN changes under different soil types. The proposed method underwent a reliability test using data from 44 study sites, and subsequently, it was carried over into the remaining 4 typical sites, employing parameters calibrated using the initial 44 sites data. The proposed method with high NSE and low RMSE values demonstrated remarkable predictive precision for runoff at the sites, surpassing the original SCS-CN approach regardless of using CN_F or CN_T. Hence, the proposed method offers versatility and is advantageous for widespread use across China’s diverse hydrological soil environments.

Abstract Image

中国不同土壤类型径流预测的修正曲线数法
由美国农业部(USDA)提出的土壤保持服务曲线数模型只有一个参数CN,是预测径流的工具。根据SCS-CN方法,土壤根据其产生径流的固有能力分为四个不同的水文土壤组(hsg)。然而,当一个类别向另一个类别过渡时,这四个离散HSG水平的描绘可能导致曲线数(CN)值的突变。为了获得更准确的CN值,更好地反映中国水文土壤条件,基于中国48个站点的降雨径流监测数据,采用中位数法(CN_M)和最小二乘拟合法(CN_F)对每个HSG的CN值进行了评估。发现这些值与USDA-SCS手册中提供的曲线数值(CN_T)明显偏离。结果表明,通过最小二乘拟合方法得到的CN_F取代CN_T,提高了传统SCS-CN方法的有效性。然而,CN_F在hsg A和hsg b中表现出较差的性能,这可能是由于在每个水文土壤组中观测到的CN值存在显著差异。因此,我们建立了考虑土壤饱和导水率(Ks)对径流预测影响的模型,以反映不同土壤类型下CN变化的影响。采用44个研究点的数据对所提出的方法进行了可靠性检验,随后,采用44个初始站点数据校准的参数,将其延续到剩余的4个典型站点。该方法具有较高的NSE值和较低的RMSE值,无论使用CN_F还是CN_T,都优于SCS-CN方法。因此,该方法具有通用性,有利于在中国不同的水文土壤环境中广泛使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信