Friend or faux: Testing the perceived authenticity of corporate socio-political activism messages on Instagram through the lens of Black Lives Matter

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Shanetta M. Pendleton
{"title":"Friend or faux: Testing the perceived authenticity of corporate socio-political activism messages on Instagram through the lens of Black Lives Matter","authors":"Shanetta M. Pendleton","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Corporations frequently use social media platforms to vocalize their social stance as part of their corporate socio-political activism (CSA) initiatives (Parcha &amp; Kingsley-Westerman, 2020). This study employed an electronic experiment using a between-subjects, posttest-only experimental design with a control group to examine the effects of Instagram posts on perceived authenticity of CSA activities. The findings of this study provide further evidence that corporations engaging in CSA can help build and maintain relationships with their external and internal publics (Park &amp; Jiang, 2020). However, these results also provide evidence of how this form of signaling can pose a threat to authenticity, and damage relationships, due to it being seen as performative and inauthentic, especially among individuals who don’t have positive attitudes toward the issue, or CSA in general (Leong, 2021; Gaither, Austin, &amp; Collins, 2018).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 2","pages":"Article 102558"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corporations frequently use social media platforms to vocalize their social stance as part of their corporate socio-political activism (CSA) initiatives (Parcha & Kingsley-Westerman, 2020). This study employed an electronic experiment using a between-subjects, posttest-only experimental design with a control group to examine the effects of Instagram posts on perceived authenticity of CSA activities. The findings of this study provide further evidence that corporations engaging in CSA can help build and maintain relationships with their external and internal publics (Park & Jiang, 2020). However, these results also provide evidence of how this form of signaling can pose a threat to authenticity, and damage relationships, due to it being seen as performative and inauthentic, especially among individuals who don’t have positive attitudes toward the issue, or CSA in general (Leong, 2021; Gaither, Austin, & Collins, 2018).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信