Exploring the role of fracture networks in enhanced geothermal systems: Insights from integrated thermal-hydraulic-mechanical-chemical and wellbore dynamics simulations

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Zhenqian Xue , Zichao Wei , Haoming Ma , Zhe Sun , Chengang Lu , Zhangxin Chen
{"title":"Exploring the role of fracture networks in enhanced geothermal systems: Insights from integrated thermal-hydraulic-mechanical-chemical and wellbore dynamics simulations","authors":"Zhenqian Xue ,&nbsp;Zichao Wei ,&nbsp;Haoming Ma ,&nbsp;Zhe Sun ,&nbsp;Chengang Lu ,&nbsp;Zhangxin Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hot dry rock (HDR) fracturing is a critical stage in the development of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), and the pattern of an engineered fracture network plays a crucial role in cumulative heat recovery. However, current studies often lack completeness and accuracy when exploring the effects of various fracture networks, overlooking key factors such as chemical reactions, wellbore dynamics, and/or rock mechanical behaviors. This study develops combined thermal-hydraulic-mechanical-chemical (THMC) and wellbore heat loss models, for the first time, to evaluate EGS heat recovery under different vertical-fracture and shear-fracture networks. The results reveal an over 3.9 % variance in heat recovery between THMC and other coupled models, while wellbore heat loss accounts for approximately 7.7 % of the thermal power production, underscoring the significance of incorporating both complex reservoir mechanisms and wellbore heat loss in EGS assessments. In addition, heat recovery improves with increased fracture spacing and number but decreased conductivity. Among vertical-fracture networks, an interrupted complex vertical-fracture system achieves the highest electricity generation of 1119.0 GWh over 20 years of operation. Meanwhile, shear-fracture networks often perform better in heat extraction than vertical-fracture systems, with the case featuring more shear fractures and higher permeability showing the highest electricity output of 1136.7 GWh. Importantly, increasing a fracture number contributes an additional 20.2 GWh, compared to only a 2.2 GWh gain from higher permeability, highlighting the fracture number as the dominant factor in shear-fracture systems. However, due to the higher injection pressure requirements, shear fracturing is best suited for reservoirs with abundant natural fractures. Otherwise, an interrupted complex fracture system is the preferred alternative. This study significantly improves the understanding of EGS performance across different fracture patterns, offering valuable insights to operators for improved decision-making in EGS development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 115636"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003090","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hot dry rock (HDR) fracturing is a critical stage in the development of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), and the pattern of an engineered fracture network plays a crucial role in cumulative heat recovery. However, current studies often lack completeness and accuracy when exploring the effects of various fracture networks, overlooking key factors such as chemical reactions, wellbore dynamics, and/or rock mechanical behaviors. This study develops combined thermal-hydraulic-mechanical-chemical (THMC) and wellbore heat loss models, for the first time, to evaluate EGS heat recovery under different vertical-fracture and shear-fracture networks. The results reveal an over 3.9 % variance in heat recovery between THMC and other coupled models, while wellbore heat loss accounts for approximately 7.7 % of the thermal power production, underscoring the significance of incorporating both complex reservoir mechanisms and wellbore heat loss in EGS assessments. In addition, heat recovery improves with increased fracture spacing and number but decreased conductivity. Among vertical-fracture networks, an interrupted complex vertical-fracture system achieves the highest electricity generation of 1119.0 GWh over 20 years of operation. Meanwhile, shear-fracture networks often perform better in heat extraction than vertical-fracture systems, with the case featuring more shear fractures and higher permeability showing the highest electricity output of 1136.7 GWh. Importantly, increasing a fracture number contributes an additional 20.2 GWh, compared to only a 2.2 GWh gain from higher permeability, highlighting the fracture number as the dominant factor in shear-fracture systems. However, due to the higher injection pressure requirements, shear fracturing is best suited for reservoirs with abundant natural fractures. Otherwise, an interrupted complex fracture system is the preferred alternative. This study significantly improves the understanding of EGS performance across different fracture patterns, offering valuable insights to operators for improved decision-making in EGS development.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信