Attention to market expansion: Aspirational antecedent and risk-taking consequence

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Renfei Gao , Cyndi Man Zhang , Xiaogang He , Zhengyu Li
{"title":"Attention to market expansion: Aspirational antecedent and risk-taking consequence","authors":"Renfei Gao ,&nbsp;Cyndi Man Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaogang He ,&nbsp;Zhengyu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The behavioral theory of the firm (BTOF) emphasizes the goal-directed logic in explaining firms’ risk-taking. Scholars in this tradition typically conceptualize how performance feedback indicates problems and triggers risk-taking behaviors. Yet, the theory remains underdeveloped in understanding decision-makers’ attention to forward-looking goals, such as market expansion, and its impact on firm risk-taking. In this study, we theorize performance feedback as an antecedent to decision-makers’ attention to forward-looking goals, and firm risk-taking as a consequence of such attention. Focusing on market expansion as a critical forward-looking goal, we first theorize how performance feedback influences decision-makers’ attention to market expansion. Then, we examine how such attention drives a firm’s risk-taking, contingent on how competitive the firm’s industry is. Using panel data on Chinese listed firms, we find that negative feedback exerts a stronger negative influence than positive feedback on decision-maker attention to market expansion. Moreover, attention to market expansion promotes firm risk-taking only when the focal firm’s industry competitive intensity is weaker. Our study extends the BTOF literature by providing novel insights and evidence that performance feedback drives firms’ attention to forward-looking goals and such attention influences firms’ risk-taking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 115322"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001456","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The behavioral theory of the firm (BTOF) emphasizes the goal-directed logic in explaining firms’ risk-taking. Scholars in this tradition typically conceptualize how performance feedback indicates problems and triggers risk-taking behaviors. Yet, the theory remains underdeveloped in understanding decision-makers’ attention to forward-looking goals, such as market expansion, and its impact on firm risk-taking. In this study, we theorize performance feedback as an antecedent to decision-makers’ attention to forward-looking goals, and firm risk-taking as a consequence of such attention. Focusing on market expansion as a critical forward-looking goal, we first theorize how performance feedback influences decision-makers’ attention to market expansion. Then, we examine how such attention drives a firm’s risk-taking, contingent on how competitive the firm’s industry is. Using panel data on Chinese listed firms, we find that negative feedback exerts a stronger negative influence than positive feedback on decision-maker attention to market expansion. Moreover, attention to market expansion promotes firm risk-taking only when the focal firm’s industry competitive intensity is weaker. Our study extends the BTOF literature by providing novel insights and evidence that performance feedback drives firms’ attention to forward-looking goals and such attention influences firms’ risk-taking.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信