Discrepancy of PD1/ PD-L1 status between primary and metastatic triple negative breast cancer in diagnostic biopsies

IF 0.2 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Manar Moustafa, Basma Hamed Ibrahim
{"title":"Discrepancy of PD1/ PD-L1 status between primary and metastatic triple negative breast cancer in diagnostic biopsies","authors":"Manar Moustafa,&nbsp;Basma Hamed Ibrahim","doi":"10.1016/j.senol.2025.100680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The evaluation of programmed death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has become routine for accurate decisions regarding immune checkpoint therapy. The aim of our paper was to analyze whether the PD-L1 evaluated in biopsy specimens accurately reflects its expression in the whole tumor and paired metastases in TNBC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Immunohistochemistry was applied on 66 biopsy and resection specimens from TNBC cases and matched metastasis to determine PD-L1 status. PD-L1 was evaluated using 4 scoring methods immune cell (IC) and tumor cell (TC) with a 1% as the cutoff value, and combined positive scores (CPSs) with a 1% and 10% as the cutoff value.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 66 TNBC patients show a statistically significant PDL1 IC positive expression with unfavorable prognostic factors. PD-L1 was positive in IC more than TC in biopsy specimen and in surgical specimen. The overall concordance between biopsies and surgical specimens at IC score was 55.2%, at CPS 1% it was 65.2%, and at CPS 10 it was 68.2%. The pooled discordance rate varied according to the cells that expressed PD-L1: A total of 37.9% of cases had discordant primary/metastatic PD-L1 status when it was assessed on immune cells, 31.8% when it was assessed on tumor cells, and 28.8% when it was assessed by CPS &gt; 10%</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Misclassifying TNBC patients as PD-L1-negative at biopsy can lead to disqualification from anti-PD-L1 therapy. PD-L1 status conversion occurs frequently between primary tumor and metastases, emphasizing the need for multiple biopsies, adequate tissue sampling, additional tests, and standardization in immunotherapy selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38058,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 100680"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214158225000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The evaluation of programmed death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has become routine for accurate decisions regarding immune checkpoint therapy. The aim of our paper was to analyze whether the PD-L1 evaluated in biopsy specimens accurately reflects its expression in the whole tumor and paired metastases in TNBC.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry was applied on 66 biopsy and resection specimens from TNBC cases and matched metastasis to determine PD-L1 status. PD-L1 was evaluated using 4 scoring methods immune cell (IC) and tumor cell (TC) with a 1% as the cutoff value, and combined positive scores (CPSs) with a 1% and 10% as the cutoff value.

Results

A total of 66 TNBC patients show a statistically significant PDL1 IC positive expression with unfavorable prognostic factors. PD-L1 was positive in IC more than TC in biopsy specimen and in surgical specimen. The overall concordance between biopsies and surgical specimens at IC score was 55.2%, at CPS 1% it was 65.2%, and at CPS 10 it was 68.2%. The pooled discordance rate varied according to the cells that expressed PD-L1: A total of 37.9% of cases had discordant primary/metastatic PD-L1 status when it was assessed on immune cells, 31.8% when it was assessed on tumor cells, and 28.8% when it was assessed by CPS > 10%

Conclusions

Misclassifying TNBC patients as PD-L1-negative at biopsy can lead to disqualification from anti-PD-L1 therapy. PD-L1 status conversion occurs frequently between primary tumor and metastases, emphasizing the need for multiple biopsies, adequate tissue sampling, additional tests, and standardization in immunotherapy selection.
原发性和转移性三阴性乳腺癌诊断活检中PD1/ PD-L1状态的差异
程序性死亡蛋白配体1 (PD-L1)在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)中的评估已经成为免疫检查点治疗的常规准确决策。本文的目的是分析活检标本中PD-L1的评估是否准确反映了其在TNBC中整个肿瘤和配对转移中的表达。方法采用免疫组化方法对66例TNBC活检和切除标本及相应的转移灶进行PD-L1状态检测。PD-L1评分采用免疫细胞(IC)和肿瘤细胞(TC) 4种评分方法,分别以1%为截止值,结合阳性评分(cps),分别以1%和10%为截止值。结果66例TNBC患者中PDL1 IC阳性表达具有统计学意义,且预后不良。活检标本和手术标本中,IC中PD-L1阳性高于TC。活检和手术标本在IC评分时的总体一致性为55.2%,在CPS 1%时为65.2%,在CPS 10时为68.2%。根据表达PD-L1的细胞不同,汇总的不一致率有所不同:免疫细胞评估的原发性/转移性PD-L1状态不一致的病例总数为37.9%,肿瘤细胞评估的PD-L1状态为31.8%,CPS评估的PD-L1状态为28.8% >; 10%结论活检时将TNBC患者误诊为PD-L1阴性可能导致抗PD-L1治疗不合格。PD-L1状态转换经常发生在原发肿瘤和转移瘤之间,强调需要多次活检、充分的组织取样、额外的测试和免疫治疗选择的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria
Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
63 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信