Application of machine learning in the context of reoperation, outcome and management after ACL reconstruction – A systematic review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Knee Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2025.02.032
Julius Michael Wolfgart , Ulf Krister Hofmann , Maximilian Praster , Marina Danalache , Filipo Migliorini , Martina Feierabend
{"title":"Application of machine learning in the context of reoperation, outcome and management after ACL reconstruction – A systematic review","authors":"Julius Michael Wolfgart ,&nbsp;Ulf Krister Hofmann ,&nbsp;Maximilian Praster ,&nbsp;Marina Danalache ,&nbsp;Filipo Migliorini ,&nbsp;Martina Feierabend","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2025.02.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Machine learning-based tools are becoming increasingly popular in clinical practice. They offer new possibilities but are also limited in their reliability and accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The present systematic review updates and discusses the existing literature regarding machine learning algorithm-based tools to predict outcome and management in patients after ACL reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>PubMed was searched for articles containing machine learning algorithms related to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its outcome and management. No additional filters or time constraints were used. All eligible studies were accessed by hand.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After screening of 115 articles, 15 were included. Six studies evaluated predictors for reoperation after ACL surgery. Four studies investigated the clinical outcome prediction after ACL reconstruction including prediction of secondary meniscus tear and secondary knee osteoarthritis. Single topics addressed in patients with ACL reconstruction were costs, opioid use, the need for a femoral nerve block, short term complications, hospital admission, and reduction of the burden to complete the Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome score questionnaire. Predictive power was very heterogeneous, depending on the specific research question and parameters included.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>New machine-learning tools offer interesting insights into variables affecting the target outcome and general management of patients with ACL reconstruction. While present machine-learning based prediction models seem to outperform previous existing benchmark regression models, their predictive ability often is still too low to base individual decision making on them. With the rapid progress observed over the last few years, it is conceivable that this might change, however, in the foreseeable future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 301-315"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016025000602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Machine learning-based tools are becoming increasingly popular in clinical practice. They offer new possibilities but are also limited in their reliability and accuracy.

Objectives

The present systematic review updates and discusses the existing literature regarding machine learning algorithm-based tools to predict outcome and management in patients after ACL reconstruction.

Method

PubMed was searched for articles containing machine learning algorithms related to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its outcome and management. No additional filters or time constraints were used. All eligible studies were accessed by hand.

Results

After screening of 115 articles, 15 were included. Six studies evaluated predictors for reoperation after ACL surgery. Four studies investigated the clinical outcome prediction after ACL reconstruction including prediction of secondary meniscus tear and secondary knee osteoarthritis. Single topics addressed in patients with ACL reconstruction were costs, opioid use, the need for a femoral nerve block, short term complications, hospital admission, and reduction of the burden to complete the Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome score questionnaire. Predictive power was very heterogeneous, depending on the specific research question and parameters included.

Conclusion

New machine-learning tools offer interesting insights into variables affecting the target outcome and general management of patients with ACL reconstruction. While present machine-learning based prediction models seem to outperform previous existing benchmark regression models, their predictive ability often is still too low to base individual decision making on them. With the rapid progress observed over the last few years, it is conceivable that this might change, however, in the foreseeable future.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Knee
Knee 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee. The topics covered include, but are not limited to: • Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry; • Biomechanical studies; • Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices; • Imaging and diagnostic techniques; • Pathology; • Trauma; • Surgery; • Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信