What We Know to Date About Early Treatment With Biologics in Severe Asthma: A Scoping Review About the Use of Biologics in Severe Asthma and Possible Parallels With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
Luis Pérez-de Llano , Mª Gema Bonilla , Elisa Luzon , Francisco Ramos-Lima , Juan Carlos Miralles
{"title":"What We Know to Date About Early Treatment With Biologics in Severe Asthma: A Scoping Review About the Use of Biologics in Severe Asthma and Possible Parallels With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis","authors":"Luis Pérez-de Llano , Mª Gema Bonilla , Elisa Luzon , Francisco Ramos-Lima , Juan Carlos Miralles","doi":"10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Theoretically, an early intervention with biologics in severe asthma (SA) patients may attenuate inflammatory processes and potentially halt disease progression and remodeling. Changing the approach to a more preventive one could alter the course of the disease, avoid its progression, and improve the likelihood of achieving clinical remission. The aims of this study were to gather scientific evidence on this topic, to draw a parallel between SA and rheumathoid arthritis (RA) and to analyze the potential benefits of establishing early treatment in SA.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A systematic scoping review, conducted in accordance with the methodological guidance of the Arksey and O’Malley framework and focusing on early treatment intervention with biological drugs in SA and RA is presented.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Evidence supports the early intervention with biologics in RA to improve outcomes. Evidence regarding early intervention with biologics in SA is scarce. To date, the literature reviewed suggests that better clinical condition of the patient and more preserved lung function at the onset of biological treatment, together with a shorter duration of asthma, are associated with better response to biologics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Data suggests that the more preventive approach may lead to improved results. The scarcity of scientific evidence highlights the importance of pursuing this line of research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34317,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Archives","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663625000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Theoretically, an early intervention with biologics in severe asthma (SA) patients may attenuate inflammatory processes and potentially halt disease progression and remodeling. Changing the approach to a more preventive one could alter the course of the disease, avoid its progression, and improve the likelihood of achieving clinical remission. The aims of this study were to gather scientific evidence on this topic, to draw a parallel between SA and rheumathoid arthritis (RA) and to analyze the potential benefits of establishing early treatment in SA.
Material and methods
A systematic scoping review, conducted in accordance with the methodological guidance of the Arksey and O’Malley framework and focusing on early treatment intervention with biological drugs in SA and RA is presented.
Results
Evidence supports the early intervention with biologics in RA to improve outcomes. Evidence regarding early intervention with biologics in SA is scarce. To date, the literature reviewed suggests that better clinical condition of the patient and more preserved lung function at the onset of biological treatment, together with a shorter duration of asthma, are associated with better response to biologics.
Conclusions
Data suggests that the more preventive approach may lead to improved results. The scarcity of scientific evidence highlights the importance of pursuing this line of research.
导言:从理论上讲,对重症哮喘(SA)患者使用生物制剂进行早期干预可减轻炎症过程,并有可能阻止疾病进展和重塑。将这种方法转变为更具预防性的方法,可以改变疾病的进程,避免其恶化,并提高实现临床缓解的可能性。本研究的目的是收集有关这一主题的科学证据,将SA与类风湿关节炎(RA)相提并论,并分析对SA进行早期治疗的潜在益处。材料与方法根据Arksey和O'Malley框架的方法论指导,对SA和RA进行了系统的范围界定综述,重点关注生物制剂对SA和RA的早期治疗干预。有关对 SA 进行生物制剂早期干预的证据很少。迄今为止,所查阅的文献表明,在开始使用生物制剂治疗时,患者的临床状况较好,肺功能得到较好的保护,同时哮喘持续时间较短,这与患者对生物制剂的较好反应有关。科学证据的稀缺性凸显了这一研究方向的重要性。