Progressive collapse resistance of prestressed precast concrete substructures with slot-bolted top-seat angles

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Hai-Rong Shi , Bin Zeng , Kai Qian , Chun-Lin Wang
{"title":"Progressive collapse resistance of prestressed precast concrete substructures with slot-bolted top-seat angles","authors":"Hai-Rong Shi ,&nbsp;Bin Zeng ,&nbsp;Kai Qian ,&nbsp;Chun-Lin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prestressed precast concrete frames rely on post-tensioned strands and energy dissipaters to interconnect members, but their progressive collapse resistance is often limited by the low deformation capacity of the dissipaters. This study introduced a novel top-seat angle connection with slotted bolt holes that enabled controlled slippage under large deformations, delaying premature failure. A comprehensive mechanical model was first developed to characterize the full-range force-deformation behavior of slot-bolted angles. Four frame substructures were then tested under a column removal scenario: one monolithic concrete specimen and three precast concrete specimens—one without angles, one with column-leg-slotted angles, and one with double-slotted angles. Results demonstrated that the precast specimen without angles outperformed the monolithic specimen under catenary action (CA) but showed weaker compression arch action (CAA). Incorporating slotted angles significantly improved CAA stiffness and resistance, achieving performance comparable to monolithic construction. Notably, the slotted angles provided a deformation capacity twice that of conventional designs and contributed approximately 20 % of total resistance at the ultimate state of collapse. The double-slotted angles could further enhance the load-bearing capacity of the substructure over the column-leg-slotted angles. These findings validated the effectiveness of slot-bolted top-seat angles in enhancing progressive collapse resistance of prestressed precast concrete frames.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 120134"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625005255","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prestressed precast concrete frames rely on post-tensioned strands and energy dissipaters to interconnect members, but their progressive collapse resistance is often limited by the low deformation capacity of the dissipaters. This study introduced a novel top-seat angle connection with slotted bolt holes that enabled controlled slippage under large deformations, delaying premature failure. A comprehensive mechanical model was first developed to characterize the full-range force-deformation behavior of slot-bolted angles. Four frame substructures were then tested under a column removal scenario: one monolithic concrete specimen and three precast concrete specimens—one without angles, one with column-leg-slotted angles, and one with double-slotted angles. Results demonstrated that the precast specimen without angles outperformed the monolithic specimen under catenary action (CA) but showed weaker compression arch action (CAA). Incorporating slotted angles significantly improved CAA stiffness and resistance, achieving performance comparable to monolithic construction. Notably, the slotted angles provided a deformation capacity twice that of conventional designs and contributed approximately 20 % of total resistance at the ultimate state of collapse. The double-slotted angles could further enhance the load-bearing capacity of the substructure over the column-leg-slotted angles. These findings validated the effectiveness of slot-bolted top-seat angles in enhancing progressive collapse resistance of prestressed precast concrete frames.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信