Vision, relationships, patience … and power: A qualitative analysis of how policy agents scale up cross-sectoral policy for nutrition

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Anne Marie Thow , Patrick Harris , Raphael Lencucha
{"title":"Vision, relationships, patience … and power: A qualitative analysis of how policy agents scale up cross-sectoral policy for nutrition","authors":"Anne Marie Thow ,&nbsp;Patrick Harris ,&nbsp;Raphael Lencucha","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Malnutrition in all its forms presents an urgent global health challenge and food systems transformation is a critical component of the necessary policy response. However, cross-sectoral policy engagement between nutrition policy makers and the policy sectors responsible for food systems change has proved challenging. This policy analysis focused on how policy makers act as agents within institutions to advance cross-sectoral policy making on food systems and nutrition, informed by theories of policy making and power. Forty-three interviews were conducted with policy actors working at global, regional and national level, in relevant sectors. The interview data were analysed iteratively, informed by theory, with a focus on actor roles, characteristics, skills and capacities and the dynamics between these dimensions. We found that successful cross-sectoral policy engagement for nutrition resulted from a dynamic interaction between agents and institutional structures, within which policy agents were able to exert ‘power to’ influence outcomes, and exert ‘power with’ multidisciplinary teams and cross-sectoral colleagues to effect change. These policy actors were able to shape ideas and create cultures and norms that supported cross-sectoral engagement, which led to effective engagement between policy sectors, characterised by constructive dialogue, shared decisions, trust, goodwill and balancing objectives across sectors. The result of this engagement was consideration of nutrition in policy making in sectors other than health, in ways that resulted in tangible policy outcomes. Success in cross-sectoral policy engagement was seen as strengthening both institutional support for cross-sectoral action on nutrition, and the ability of policy actors to overcome barriers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"372 ","pages":"Article 117939"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625002680","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Malnutrition in all its forms presents an urgent global health challenge and food systems transformation is a critical component of the necessary policy response. However, cross-sectoral policy engagement between nutrition policy makers and the policy sectors responsible for food systems change has proved challenging. This policy analysis focused on how policy makers act as agents within institutions to advance cross-sectoral policy making on food systems and nutrition, informed by theories of policy making and power. Forty-three interviews were conducted with policy actors working at global, regional and national level, in relevant sectors. The interview data were analysed iteratively, informed by theory, with a focus on actor roles, characteristics, skills and capacities and the dynamics between these dimensions. We found that successful cross-sectoral policy engagement for nutrition resulted from a dynamic interaction between agents and institutional structures, within which policy agents were able to exert ‘power to’ influence outcomes, and exert ‘power with’ multidisciplinary teams and cross-sectoral colleagues to effect change. These policy actors were able to shape ideas and create cultures and norms that supported cross-sectoral engagement, which led to effective engagement between policy sectors, characterised by constructive dialogue, shared decisions, trust, goodwill and balancing objectives across sectors. The result of this engagement was consideration of nutrition in policy making in sectors other than health, in ways that resulted in tangible policy outcomes. Success in cross-sectoral policy engagement was seen as strengthening both institutional support for cross-sectoral action on nutrition, and the ability of policy actors to overcome barriers.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信