How do distance learners self-regulate learning? A latent profile analysis of self-regulated learning and its relationship with self-regulatory efficacy, motivation, need satisfaction, need frustration, academic achievement, and well-being
Samantha G. Vos, Lisette Wijnia, Rob L. Martens, Renate H.M. de Groot
{"title":"How do distance learners self-regulate learning? A latent profile analysis of self-regulated learning and its relationship with self-regulatory efficacy, motivation, need satisfaction, need frustration, academic achievement, and well-being","authors":"Samantha G. Vos, Lisette Wijnia, Rob L. Martens, Renate H.M. de Groot","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Self-regulated learning (SRL) is important for academic success in flexible learning environments such as online distance education. In this study, we explored the relationship between SRL and factors such as self-regulatory efficacy, motivation, psychological need satisfaction, mental well-being, and academic achievement among 1151 distance learners using mixture modeling. Latent profile analysis identified five SRL profiles varying from poor (i.e., Low and Minimal profiles) to proactive SRL (i.e., Social, Moderate, and Independent profiles) based on self-reported SRL strategies (e.g., task understanding and time management). Self-regulatory efficacy was an important differentiator between poor and proactive SRL, while competence frustration correlated with membership in proactive profiles. Relatedness satisfaction predicted membership in the Social SRL profile (49.6 %), emphasizing the importance of online social presence in supporting SRL. Moreover, higher academic achievement and well-being were linked to Low, Social, or Independent profiles rather than Minimal or Moderate ones. These findings highlight how distance learners self-regulate and how the learning context influences SRL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102678"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000548","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Self-regulated learning (SRL) is important for academic success in flexible learning environments such as online distance education. In this study, we explored the relationship between SRL and factors such as self-regulatory efficacy, motivation, psychological need satisfaction, mental well-being, and academic achievement among 1151 distance learners using mixture modeling. Latent profile analysis identified five SRL profiles varying from poor (i.e., Low and Minimal profiles) to proactive SRL (i.e., Social, Moderate, and Independent profiles) based on self-reported SRL strategies (e.g., task understanding and time management). Self-regulatory efficacy was an important differentiator between poor and proactive SRL, while competence frustration correlated with membership in proactive profiles. Relatedness satisfaction predicted membership in the Social SRL profile (49.6 %), emphasizing the importance of online social presence in supporting SRL. Moreover, higher academic achievement and well-being were linked to Low, Social, or Independent profiles rather than Minimal or Moderate ones. These findings highlight how distance learners self-regulate and how the learning context influences SRL.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).