Plague or cholera? Stakeholder perspectives on Norwegian salmon farming regulations

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Juliana Figueira Haugen, Jon Olaf Olaussen
{"title":"Plague or cholera? Stakeholder perspectives on Norwegian salmon farming regulations","authors":"Juliana Figueira Haugen,&nbsp;Jon Olaf Olaussen","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite its success, Norway's salmon farming industry has caused environmental challenges, which have significantly altered the management and regulatory needs of the industry. The current Norwegian regulatory framework faces criticism when it comes to its ability to generate sustainable practices within the industry, and many also argue that current governmental incentives for innovation are insufficient in light of escalating environmental externalities. In addition, a lack of consensus among stakeholders regarding such impacts still remain. Given this scenario, understanding the diverse perspectives of stakeholders is believed to raise awareness of diverse viewpoints, foster deeper understanding, and build consensus across different sectors. Thus, this paper aims to investigate stakeholder perceptions concerning the current Norwegian regulatory landscape for salmon farming. Through semi-structured interviews with government officials, experts, fishers, industry and ENGO representatives, our research identifies five pivotal themes: (1) challenges with the current Traffic Light System - the most important aquaculture regulation in Norway, (2) salmon lice control versus farmed salmon’s welfare, (3) supervision challenges and regulatory loopholes, (4) the call for policies that support technological innovation, (5) and perceptions of the industry and the call for more collaboration. Our findings reveal that, despite different views, there is a broad consensus on the need for a regulatory reform in order to steer the industry towards more sustainable practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 106685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25001009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its success, Norway's salmon farming industry has caused environmental challenges, which have significantly altered the management and regulatory needs of the industry. The current Norwegian regulatory framework faces criticism when it comes to its ability to generate sustainable practices within the industry, and many also argue that current governmental incentives for innovation are insufficient in light of escalating environmental externalities. In addition, a lack of consensus among stakeholders regarding such impacts still remain. Given this scenario, understanding the diverse perspectives of stakeholders is believed to raise awareness of diverse viewpoints, foster deeper understanding, and build consensus across different sectors. Thus, this paper aims to investigate stakeholder perceptions concerning the current Norwegian regulatory landscape for salmon farming. Through semi-structured interviews with government officials, experts, fishers, industry and ENGO representatives, our research identifies five pivotal themes: (1) challenges with the current Traffic Light System - the most important aquaculture regulation in Norway, (2) salmon lice control versus farmed salmon’s welfare, (3) supervision challenges and regulatory loopholes, (4) the call for policies that support technological innovation, (5) and perceptions of the industry and the call for more collaboration. Our findings reveal that, despite different views, there is a broad consensus on the need for a regulatory reform in order to steer the industry towards more sustainable practices.
瘟疫还是霍乱?利益相关者对挪威鲑鱼养殖法规的看法
尽管取得了成功,但挪威的鲑鱼养殖业也带来了环境挑战,这极大地改变了该行业的管理和监管需求。目前挪威的监管框架在行业内产生可持续实践的能力方面面临批评,许多人还认为,鉴于不断升级的环境外部性,目前政府对创新的激励措施不足。此外,利益相关者之间对此类影响仍然缺乏共识。在这种情况下,理解利益相关者的不同观点被认为可以提高对不同观点的认识,促进更深层次的理解,并在不同部门之间建立共识。因此,本文旨在调查利益相关者对当前挪威鲑鱼养殖监管格局的看法。通过对政府官员、专家、渔民、行业和ENGO代表的半结构化访谈,我们的研究确定了五个关键主题:(1)当前交通灯系统的挑战——挪威最重要的水产养殖监管;(2)鲑鱼虱控制与养殖鲑鱼的福利;(3)监管挑战和监管漏洞;(4)支持技术创新的政策呼吁;(5)对行业的看法和对更多合作的呼吁。我们的研究结果表明,尽管有不同的观点,但为了引导行业走向更可持续的实践,需要进行监管改革,这是一个广泛的共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信