Elena Razenkova , Katarzyna E. Lewińska , Akash Anand , He Yin , Laura S. Farwell , Anna M. Pidgeon , Patrick Hostert , Nicholas C. Coops , Volker C. Radeloff
{"title":"Medium-resolution Dynamic Habitat Indices from Landsat and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery","authors":"Elena Razenkova , Katarzyna E. Lewińska , Akash Anand , He Yin , Laura S. Farwell , Anna M. Pidgeon , Patrick Hostert , Nicholas C. Coops , Volker C. Radeloff","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biodiversity science requires effective tools to predict patterns of species diversity at multiple temporal and spatial scales. The Dynamic Habitat Indices (DHIs) are remotely sensed indices that summarize aboveground vegetation productivity in a way that is ecologically relevant for biodiversity assessments. Existing global DHIs, derived from MODIS at 1-km resolution, predict species richness at broad scales well, but that resolution is coarse relative to the grain at which many species perceive their habitat. With the much finer spatial resolution of Sentinel-2 and Landsat data, plus Landsat’s longer data record, it is possible to track potential changes of vegetation and its impacts on biodiversity at a finer grain over longer periods. Here, our main goals were to derive the DHIs from 10-m Sentinel-2, 30-m Landsat, and 250-m MODIS data for the conterminous US and compare all DHIs at two spatial extents, and to evaluate the ability of these DHIs to predict bird species richness in 25 National Ecological Observatory Network terrestrial sites. In addition, we derived the Landsat DHIs for 1991–2000 and investigated how they changed by 2011–2020. We found that the Sentinel-2, Landsat, and MODIS DHIs were highly correlated when summarized by ecoregion (Spearman correlation ranging from 0.89 to 0.99), indicating good agreement between them and that we were able to overcome the lower temporal resolution of Sentinel-2 and Landsat. Sentinel-2 and Landsat DHIs outperformed MODIS in modeling species richness for all bird guilds, explaining up to 49% of variance of grassland affiliates in linear regression models. Furthermore medium-resolution DHIs (10–30 m resolution) captured spatial heterogeneity much better than MODIS DHIs. We observed considerable changes in Landsat DHIs from 1991–2000 to 2011–2020, such as increased cumulative DHI along the West Coast, in mountain ranges, and in the South, but lower cumulative DHI in the Midwest. Our newly derived DHIs for the conterminous US have great potential for use in biodiversity science and conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 113367"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25002973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biodiversity science requires effective tools to predict patterns of species diversity at multiple temporal and spatial scales. The Dynamic Habitat Indices (DHIs) are remotely sensed indices that summarize aboveground vegetation productivity in a way that is ecologically relevant for biodiversity assessments. Existing global DHIs, derived from MODIS at 1-km resolution, predict species richness at broad scales well, but that resolution is coarse relative to the grain at which many species perceive their habitat. With the much finer spatial resolution of Sentinel-2 and Landsat data, plus Landsat’s longer data record, it is possible to track potential changes of vegetation and its impacts on biodiversity at a finer grain over longer periods. Here, our main goals were to derive the DHIs from 10-m Sentinel-2, 30-m Landsat, and 250-m MODIS data for the conterminous US and compare all DHIs at two spatial extents, and to evaluate the ability of these DHIs to predict bird species richness in 25 National Ecological Observatory Network terrestrial sites. In addition, we derived the Landsat DHIs for 1991–2000 and investigated how they changed by 2011–2020. We found that the Sentinel-2, Landsat, and MODIS DHIs were highly correlated when summarized by ecoregion (Spearman correlation ranging from 0.89 to 0.99), indicating good agreement between them and that we were able to overcome the lower temporal resolution of Sentinel-2 and Landsat. Sentinel-2 and Landsat DHIs outperformed MODIS in modeling species richness for all bird guilds, explaining up to 49% of variance of grassland affiliates in linear regression models. Furthermore medium-resolution DHIs (10–30 m resolution) captured spatial heterogeneity much better than MODIS DHIs. We observed considerable changes in Landsat DHIs from 1991–2000 to 2011–2020, such as increased cumulative DHI along the West Coast, in mountain ranges, and in the South, but lower cumulative DHI in the Midwest. Our newly derived DHIs for the conterminous US have great potential for use in biodiversity science and conservation.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.